Everybody wants President Obama to be more openly forceful with Iran. I mean what could our illegal President possibly say?. Tell President Ahmadinejad he shouldn’t fix elections?. I mean after the 2008 Presidential run and election it was everything as fixed as the Iran election. From our corrupt media to the Presidents constitutional ineligibility what makes our election process any less corrupt then theirs?.
CNN, MSNBC, New York Times and every other liberal newspaper, media outlet across the country for years bashed, manipulated, failed to report, fraud, ½ truths to the point it slanted the election for Barack Obama. What makes us any different gang?. We have 2 individuals Chris Dodd and Barney Frank responsible for largest worldwide financial disaster in recorded history still serving in the Financial Services Committee as if nothing happened. What does that say about us?.
President Obama blaming George Bush for virtually everything on nearly a daily basis. Did anyone ever hear George Bush openly blame President Clinton for the mess he inherited?. Nope, because the man wasn’t a Presidential Whiner. Nancy Pelosi?, what bunch of intellectual retards put this other intellectual retard in her position. Democrat’s for years bitching about the Bush Administration, republican Congress and look at us now. Yes indeedy this lot sure has their shit together let me tell ya.
I don’t know about you folks but I’ll take a religious hypocrite 50% of the time over the dumb, stupid, do nothing, tax soaking and immoral a 100% of the time. At least when a republican gets into trouble they resign. These criminals have to be dragged off the stage kicking and biting. They don’t have enough moral character to resign. The same goes for the people who voted them into office to terrorize the nation.
In closing,
Maybe it’s best our President doesn’t comment further on Iran. Doesn’t want to call the “ chickens home to roost “ just yet. Yes, what goes around comes around. Truth in practice what you preach. When you don’t, best to stand mute. I’m surprised our President hasn’t come out with the old he has “ no standing “ to comment on Iran. That be a hoot eh gang.
Copy & paste to friend: (Click inside box; Ctrl + C to copy; Ctrl + V to paste)
|
|
read more blogs!
Blogs by Supremebeing412:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A President in Silence ……………. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RightWingRepublican
|
Jun 21 @ 11:50PM
|
|
Even though i'm completely against everything Obama has said and done, i don't believe this election was rigged in the way people think.
It was rigged by the voters and media.
People who NEVER voted on anything wanted to come out by the bus load and vote for the black guy. i saw it over and over. Little old black ladies on tv, so proud that they never partook in democracy until there was a half black guy running for pres.
they never bothered before to vote, until then.
Take away the old people who never voted that did this time, McCain won.
Democracy is a bitch sometimes.
has he said anything about North Korea and the missles everyone is claiming are on a boat somewhere? I caught a glimpse of the story tonight.
|
|
Supremebeing412
|
Jun 21 @ 11:53PM
|
|
|
voters and media
The media rigged the voters. Other then the process what's different about the result?
|
|
RightWingRepublican
|
Jun 21 @ 11:57PM
|
|
What's different is that people who fought for years for their right to vote, got the right and then didn't do shit with it until "one of them" ran for president.
That's different than any other election. He didn't win because he deserved to.
|
|
Supremebeing412
|
Jun 22 @ 12:18AM
|
|
|
Well let me ask this. What's the difference between manipulating the voters and manipulating the votes?. Are you saying that the purpose of the Democratic party with Barack Obama wasn't to manipulate black voters and those bullied and brainwashed into sympathy over slavery?. Given Barack Obama's track record what else made him a viable candidate other then his color?.
|
|
Wing_Zero_75
|
Jun 22 @ 1:00AM
|
|
I say there needs to be a test before you can vote. If you cant pass a basic test on what the canidate are for or against, you dont vote. 20 question, multiple choice. If you cant get 15 or more then you dont know what your talking about and NO VOTE FOR YOU. Maybe that would weed out those who vote for people based on bribes or color. In MN an exs mother was approached by a gore campiagn group and gave out $5 and a pack of cigarettes to but votes. People like that would be weeded out. The thing is they would find a way around it.
We do need to be more assertive in the Iran affair. obama doesnt want to anger his muslim supporters. He is losing credibility in Israel over his catering to the muslims. So why would you expect him to grow some nuts and do anything but give a stern gesture of indifference?
|
|
Herodotus
|
Jun 22 @ 1:14AM
|
|
When I read those words,"illegal President", my mind wandered back to Florida, around nine years ago, I think it was.There was good 'old Jeb Bush, Governer of the State and a bunch of spoilt chads and what do you know,the US had its first illegal President about to engage in an illegal war.
Partys Over
|
|
kjac
|
Jun 22 @ 1:45AM
|
|
Yeah wing, great idea. One party didn't win, so lets change the rules of democracy so maybe they will next time. 
|
|
Wing_Zero_75
|
Jun 22 @ 1:53AM
|
|
kjac. No, it would work both ways. Maybe people would be more educated when they vote. Or not at all. Its a damned if you do, damned if you dont. Why should people be voted in on how they look or their color? I wasnt happy with McCain either. He was the "Bob Dole" sacrafice of 08.
Herodotus. People in florida lost my respect when what happened came out. The rules were simple, punch one hole. Now reading that what would you do? Punch one or 2 holes? the people of florida punched 2 holes thinking they were voting for gore and lieberman. In reality what they were doing is voting for gore and Pat Buchannon. They wanted to show their educated support of the 2 democrat candidates. Not by following the rules by.........punching 1 hole. If they had a brain cell in their head, they would have followed the rules, or at least be aware of what holes they were punching. Maybe if they were educated enough to at least read, then we wouldnt have had such a problem, huh?
Larry
|
|
lovestobake
|
Jun 22 @ 1:55AM
|
|
|
The big complaint by the Dems. was the voting process was to completed, and many didn't recieve help at the polls. A tv news station set up a mock voting booth in a fifth grade class and all the kids voted properly. It works both ways fair or not, it went through the courts and that is the system. No favoritism here, I don't have much use for either party.
|
|
RightWingRepublican
|
Jun 22 @ 1:57AM
|
|
|
Well let me ask this. What's the difference between manipulating the voters and manipulating the votes?. Are you saying that the purpose of the Democratic party with Barack Obama wasn't to manipulate black voters and those bullied and brainwashed into sympathy over slavery?. Given Barack Obama's track record what else made him a viable candidate other then his color?.
There is a difference. Having some guy behind a curtain removing votes or changing ballots and people coming out in hordes for the first time because they suddenly felt compelled to vote is a very different thing. One's illegal and one is not.
But it's worse knowing that there were X amount of people that rigged it instead of one wizard of oz behind a curtain. SO many people corrupted the election.
That's exactly it. They WERE manipulated into believing they just HAD to go and vote for the guy. In their minds, if they didn't, the world would have ended. Did anything actually make him a viable candidate?
Yeah wing, great idea. One party didn't win, so lets change the rules of democracy so maybe they will next time.
Now come on, you can't honestly say that this what i say didn't happen.
People who never voted ever, came out in full force to vote for a half black guy.
Again, they fought so hard to get their right to vote, it's given to them, and then they NEVER use it. Some people went 60+ years without ever voting. Toss a black guy on a podium and they're right there to vote or him.
I like the idea of testing before voting. But i think there should be a time limit on voting. If you don't vote for, let's say 2 elections, you lose the right.
We shouldn't be allowed to pick and choose when to vote. People died for the right and it should be used. If it's not important enough to do every time, then you probably shouldn't be doing it.
|
|
kjac
|
Jun 22 @ 1:58AM
|
|
Wing, you are either neglecting or selectively choosing to forget the fact that the test would have to be made by...
You guessed it, politicians.
But the discussion is moot. Because all spin aside, a desperate power-grab idea like yours would never fly in this country.
|
|
kjac
|
Jun 22 @ 2:02AM
|
|
|
I was adressing Wing-zero BTW, not RWR.
|
|
dizzydoll
|
Jun 22 @ 6:09AM
|
|
|
The Party's Over
Hero, her voice is really good, enjoyed that. look forward to the next
|
|
ttomtarr
|
Jun 22 @ 8:23AM
|
|
SB Yo0u forgot to mention the scam nine years ago. If it had happened in Cenrtal america, it would have been correctly labeled a "right wing coup". Bush coulldn't whine about Clinton;s treatment of the economy, because Bill left the white house with a balanced budget, and good national credit that Bush's two terms used to borrow, rip off, and leave us with the debt, as well as a destroyed economy.
I wish old George W had kept his mouth shut more often, and his hand in his own pocket.
|
|
ElmerFudd445
|
Jun 22 @ 8:35AM
|
|
I find this blog without merit..
Yes Bush blamed Clinton for problems he inherited.. But some seem to have selective memory about it. .
2006 Bush blamed Clinton for paving the way of N Korean nuclear arsenal build up ..
He blamed Clinton for the recession. (even tho Clinton left office with a surplus of dollars compared to past presidents) This recession quote made in 2002.. before he would admit we were heading into a recession..
In June of 2000 Bush blamed Clinton administration for high gasoline prices..
Bush blamed the Clinton administration for policies that lead to 9/11..
There is more complaints that were made out there.. The blame game has always been part of the game ..
But I do agree with one point that is touched on but not talked about..
I feel Obama is using the blame game to try and show the public what he is doing and how he is working to try and fix things.. I think this is backfiring on him..
I will give one kudo to President Bush.. There is a lot of finger pointing he could have done with Clinton with his scandal filled administration, and he didn't.. (tho that may have been because he was in over his head)
As far as media being biased toward liberal or conservative.. I'll agree it slants to the liberal side.. but it is really about what sells stories.. Look at the Clinton scandal.. The press was on him like a cat on a mouse..
|
|
imlost2
|
Jun 22 @ 8:38AM
|
|
|
Well, we have a North Korea Ship with what they think have Nukes on it traveling across the sea and he's too chicken to stop it and check it out, they are just gonna let it reach it's destination. He's too chicken to say what needs to be said and stick up for the people who are demonstrating against their own country of Iran showing they know the election was fixed when we are suppose to be a country for free elections, go figure. Now his dear organized group Acorn just changed their name so they wouldn't be so noticed as a rip off company and corrupt and still gets funds from the stimulus bill, hey what do you expect? He hides, pure and simple just like hiding his records, he's a chicken of a President with no guts. At least Bush had guts to serve as a President, I can give him that. Lost
|
|
Wing_Zero_75
|
Jun 22 @ 8:40AM
|
|
Yeah, alright kjac, you got me on that one. I was thinking it could be 200-300 questions. Then as a voter would come to get their test a computer would randomly pick 20 questions. But like you said politicians would pick the questions. And I am sure both sides would try to hack it.
Though my thought on the voting system is like the test you take for a drivers license. If you fail you dont get it. So why should voting be any different?
It wasnt so much neglecting or selective omission, its just hard figuring out all of the worlds problems and trying to fix them.  And yes that was me tryin to be funny
Larry
|
|
ElmerFudd445
|
Jun 22 @ 8:43AM
|
|
|
I don’t know about you folks but I’ll take a religious hypocrite 50% of the time over the dumb, stupid, do nothing, tax soaking and immoral a 100% of the time. At least when a republican gets into trouble they resign. These criminals have to be dragged off the stage kicking and biting.
Obviously you were not around during Nixon era.. Yes he resigned.. but only after he knew he's been caught doing some of the most illegal activities that ever surfaced in a presidents term of office.. Claiming he was president and was above the law..
I could blame republicans for this.. but.. it was the man in power..
|
|
imlost2
|
Jun 22 @ 9:12AM
|
|
|
News has just reported that Our President who is bought and paid for by the Unions, is proposing a health care bill where the unions are exempt paying a higher tax for health care. The rest of us will have to pay and get less out of this program with a tax hike, and the unions pay nothing and get more. Hmmmmm figures. Lost
|
|
donato
|
Jun 22 @ 9:42AM
|
|
For me how Obama got elected is really quite simple and it's been in the works for years. Acorn  He would not ever been elected without Acorn and the under the table Chicago players.When you can push the care less masses and the inexperienced to get out and vote for Mr. Rock Star...Guess what ?? ...We now have a Rock Star running the country  God help America my friends 
|
|
skyscraper948
|
Jun 22 @ 10:07AM
|
|
|
People who NEVER voted on anything wanted to come out by the bus load and vote for the black guy. i saw it over and over. Little old black ladies on tv, so proud that they never partook in democracy until there was a half black guy running for pres.
And geez, i though more people coming out to vote was a good thing. I guess not... Republicans seem to like when people stay home... its the only way they can win. lol. Seriously, though... this statement is depressing. People for the first time in a long time were excited about a presidential candidate. Not me, honestly. But alot of people. And it was very inspiring. It doesnt matter who participated and when they did. Very sad RWR, very sad.
I say there needs to be a test before you can vote. If you cant pass a basic test on what the canidate are for or against, you dont vote. 20 question, multiple choice. If you cant get 15 or more then you dont know what your talking about and NO VOTE FOR YOU.
.... and speaking of sad... Yea, wing... ummmmmm, this has been done before... In the south, during the Jim Crow era. To prevent blacks from voting. It was declared unconstitutional. WOW. I cant believe this was actually said, out loud, by someone. I'm hoping it was a joke.
Maybe it’s best our President doesn’t comment further on Iran. Doesn’t want to call the “ chickens home to roost “ just yet. Yes, what goes around comes around. Truth in practice what you preach. When you don’t, best to stand mute. I’m surprised our President hasn’t come out with the old he has “ no standing “ to comment on Iran. That be a hoot eh gang.
What do you propose we do about Iran supreme? Nuke them. Kills millions of innocent people? What? I'd love to know you thoughts... considering Iran is well within their rights under international law to use atomic energy for civilian purposes. Israel doesnt like it, but its perfectly legal under the NPT. (Which Israel refuses to sign, btw).
|
|
dizzydoll
|
Jun 22 @ 10:10AM
|
|
oh gosh, supreme... youve got your stalker back again. i suppose skyscraper really wants to be friends
give the boy a break
|
|
skyscraper948
|
Jun 22 @ 10:16AM
|
|
|
oh gosh, supreme... youve got your stalker back again. i suppose skyscraper really wants to be friends
hahahahahahaha, i'm going to hound him like a bad debt until he starts using his brain. hahahahahahaha.
|
|
Supremebeing412
|
Jun 22 @ 10:47AM
|
|
As usual no admittance.
Was the 2008 elections just as corrupted as Iran's recent election?, yes. The method may have been different but the end result just the same. You had a corrupted media play a large part in getting Barack Obama elected. You had a political party hungry for power that ran a candidate based on "not the merits" of the candidate but rather the color of the candidate in an effort to gain votes.
What is the interest and purpose of our political party's suppose to be?. The interest of the country or the interest of their power?. Isn't the idea of Presidential elections and candidates to produce the best possible person for the job and for the good of the country?. Where did the elction of President Obama fulfill that obligation?.
The voters were more interested in voting for the first black President then the merits of the candidate. The merits of the candidate hidden, skewed and manipulated by a corrupt media. The political party itself with the sole interest of gaining power places a candidate not on his merits but to sway voters.
At the end of all this what did we end up with?. The best person able to do the job or a black President?. The democratic party in combination with a corrupt media was able to sway voters for Barack Obama hence, the United States had it's first black President, the democratic party won the Presidancy and the country, it's people and it' direction an immaterial issue.
|
|
skyscraper948
|
Jun 22 @ 11:04AM
|
|
|
Was the 2008 elections just as corrupted as Iran's recent election?, yes. The method may have been different but the end result just the same. You had a corrupted media play a large part in getting Barack Obama elected.
... and your evidence of fraud in Iran's election is?????? Twitter posts?
|
|
Supremebeing412
|
Jun 22 @ 11:13AM
|
|
|
and your evidence of fraud in Iran's election is?????? Twitter posts?
You obviously don't know much about Iran. The fact the rest of the world has to rely on Twitter posts for information should be a testimony to Irans political processes. Maybe you should think about what you post first so you can avoid putting your foot in your mouth.
|
|
skyscraper948
|
Jun 22 @ 11:45AM
|
|
|
You obviously don't know much about Iran. The fact the rest of the world has to rely on Twitter posts for information should be a testimony to Irans political processes. Maybe you should think about what you post first so you can avoid putting your foot in your mouth.
You didnt answer and i know why... because there is no evidence. The people of Iran elected someone you disagree with and *gasp* the United States may have to deal with.
|
|
AngelLight
|
Jun 22 @ 11:52AM
|
|
|
I mean what could our illegal President possibly say?
Ah, like the 2004 "election" of Bush wasn't a fraud? Florida was a "fluke" right?
Exactly, what makes our election process any less corrupt?
Alex Pelosi's new film "Diary of a Political Tourist" catches a tipsy Congressman Peter King making a comment at a White House function before the election had been finished that, "It's already over. The Election's over. We Won."
When Pelosi asks, "How do you know that?" King replies, "It's all over but the counting. And we'll take care of the counting." [Common Dreams]
Hail our "democracy" as politicians, corporations, special interest groups laugh their way to the bank.
Mass Destruction by Faithless
Whether long range weapon or suicide bomber
Wicked mind is a weapon of mass destruction
Whether you're soar away sun or BBC 1
Misinformation is a weapon of mass destruction
You could a Caucasian or a poor Asian
Racism is a weapon of mass destruction
Whether inflation or globalization
Fear is a weapon of mass destruction
My Dad came into my room holding his hat
I knew he was leaving,
he sat on my bed told me some facts, son
I have a duty, calling on me
You and your sister be brave my little soldier
And don't forget all I told ya
You're the mister of the house now remember this
And when you wake up in the morning give ya Momma a kiss
Then I had to say goodbye
In the morning woke Momma with a kiss on each eyelid,
Even though I'm only a kid
Certain things can't be hid
Momma grabbed me
Held me like I was made of gold
But left her inner stories untold
I said, Momma it will be alright
When daddy comes home, tonight
Whether long range weapon or suicide bomber
Wicked mind is a weapon of mass destruction
Whether you're soar away sun or BBC 1
Misinformation is a weapon of mass destruction
You could a Caucasian or a poor Asian
Racism is a weapon of mass destruction
Whether inflation or globalization
Fear is a weapon of mass destruction
Whether Halliburton, Enron or anyone
Greed is a weapon of mass destruction
We need to find courage, overcome
Inaction is a weapon of mass destruction
Inaction is a weapon of mass destruction
Inaction is a weapon of mass destruction
My story stops here, lets be clear
This scenario is happening everywhere
And you ain't going to nirvana or farvana
You're coming right back here to live out your karma
With even more drama than previously, seriously
Just how many centuries have we been
waiting for someone else to make us free
And we refuse to see
That people overseas suffer just like we
Bad leadership and ego's unfettered and free
Who feed on the people they're supposed to lead
I don't need good people to pray and wait
For the lord to make it all straight
There's only now, do it right.
Cos I don't want your Daddy, leaving home tonight.
|
|
Supremebeing412
|
Jun 22 @ 12:45PM
|
|
|
Ah, like the 2004 "election" of Bush wasn't a fraud? Florida was a "fluke" right?
I don't know was it?. George Bush was always ahead in the polls in Florida. I know his brother the governor was extremely liked. Anyway's was does this have to do with the 2008 election?
|
|
Wing_Zero_75
|
Jun 22 @ 12:48PM
|
|
Skycraper, you say that it is sad for me to even mention what I did out loud. Why? Would you want someone driving without knowing how to? Would you want a doctor doing surgery on you without knowing what they are doing? So why is it such a stretch to want voters to know what they are voting for? You may think there are no similarities between any of them, but I am sure you wouldnt want a doctor messing around with your body not knowing what they are doing. One must have an understanding of whats going on before they can vote, or at least thats the way it should be. As far as the Jim Crow era, that was at a different time and place. I am not trying to disciminate against anyone other than those that have no clue what they are doing. Would you like the board of directors of the company you work for vote on nothing they know about? What if your job was on the line and you lost it because some people had no idea the effects or impact of their decisions had on your life? Wouldnt you be out there screaming of unfairness? So why should people who have no idea about what is going on in the government be allowed to vote on the government? I used a corporation as an example, I do not know what you do for work or pretend I do. So is it unconstitutional to deny a person a gun just because they dont knnow how to use it? If this were a perfect world then we wouldnt even have to think about these problems. Seeing its not and people buy into what they hear and read, no matter how slanted it is, shouldnt they have at least some sort of knowledge about what is going on?
Larry
|
|
Supremebeing412
|
Jun 22 @ 12:54PM
|
|
|
The people of Iran elected someone you disagree with and *gasp* the United States may have to deal with.
Why would I care about the politics of Iran?. I answered your question but apparently that went over the top of your 1 foot body. Again you have nothing of substantive value as it relates to the blog so rather then proving me wrong you want proof of the fraud in Iran.
|
|
skyscraper948
|
Jun 22 @ 1:17PM
|
|
|
Skycraper, you say that it is sad for me to even mention what I did out loud. Why? Would you want someone driving without knowing how to? Would you want a doctor doing surgery on you without knowing what they are doing? So why is it such a stretch to want voters to know what they are voting for? You may think there are no similarities between any of them, but I am sure you wouldnt want a doctor messing around with your body not knowing what they are doing. One must have an understanding of whats going on before they can vote, or at least thats the way it should be. As far as the Jim Crow era, that was at a different time and place. I am not trying to disciminate against anyone other than those that have no clue what they are doing. Would you like the board of directors of the company you work for vote on nothing they know about? What if your job was on the line and you lost it because some people had no idea the effects or impact of their decisions had on your life? Wouldnt you be out there screaming of unfairness? So why should people who have no idea about what is going on in the government be allowed to vote on the government? I used a corporation as an example, I do not know what you do for work or pretend I do. So is it unconstitutional to deny a person a gun just because they dont knnow how to use it? If this were a perfect world then we wouldnt even have to think about these problems. Seeing its not and people buy into what they hear and read, no matter how slanted it is, shouldnt they have at least some sort of knowledge about what is going on?
Larry
Ideally, the electorate should be informed but it is not a requirement and shouldn't be as it is unconstitutional. In your examples, you're mixing to different ideas of regulating the private sector (which is necessary), AND people having a say in their government, despite their education level. I mean, if we had that... supreme wouldnt be able to vote. hahahaha. And i support his right to vote even though he is a clown. Its one of the founding principles of this nation... "for the people, by the people".
Why would I care about the politics of Iran?. I answered your question but apparently that went over the top of your 1 foot body. Again you have nothing of substantive value as it relates to the blog so rather then proving me wrong you want proof of the fraud in Iran.
no jackass, I was wondering on what exactly you base your claim that the elections in Iran were rigged? You have no answer and therefore no basis for your argument. As usual.
|
|
dizzydoll
|
Jun 22 @ 2:09PM
|
|
well maybe you bum-buddies who knows?
|
|
AngelLight
|
Jun 22 @ 2:11PM
|
|
|
I Say ~
Ah, like the 2004 "election" of Bush wasn't a fraud? Florida was a "fluke" right?
Your Response ~
I don't know was it?. George Bush was always ahead in the polls in Florida. I know his brother the governor was extremely liked. Anyway's was does this have to do with the 2008 election?
EXACTLY, you can't or don't make the connection. That's the point. You actually refer to Obama as "our illegal President" but somehow fail to see or acknowledge that Bush was illegally "voted" into office.
What you clearly DO see is that OUR election process in the USA can be just as much of a scam as anywhere else in the world....
just not when it comes to say, the likes of Bush being "voted" into office?
|
|
Supremebeing412
|
Jun 22 @ 2:59PM
|
|
|
no jackass, I was wondering on what exactly you base your claim that the elections in Iran were rigged
Does it matter?. Why would it matter to you?. You have shown throughout the blogs skyscraper that you have no interest in facts. In the Constitution v. Barack Obama blog overwhelming circumstantial evidence was brought to light that anyone in their right might would concede that President Obama was hiding something of importance. The only reason why it's circumstatial is because Obama refuses to release thedocuments. What did you but act like an idiot.
You made this comment on one of my blogs;
supreme... i like you. you have more guts than zanie... who refused to post my comments
Do you blame Zanie?.
Has someone lead you to believe that you are a practical and common sense individual?. Your a typical liberal. You provide no substantive facts only question those of others. You copy & paste materials with no bearng and or don't understand while acting as though you have the mental capacity to question someone elses substantive facts. The fact of the matter is that no matter what evidence is brought to bare your not here for practical debate your here to disrupt because you haven't the intellectual capacity to enter the debate.
As I said before you obviously no little about the working of the Iranian government and the supreme leader. Why don't you read a little background on Mahmud Ahmadinejad, so on and see if you come back with same stupid question.
Otherwise don't come back.
|
|
Supremebeing412
|
Jun 22 @ 3:01PM
|
|
|
EXACTLY, you can't or don't make the connection. That's the point. You actually refer to Obama as "our illegal President" but somehow fail to see or acknowledge that Bush was illegally "voted" into office.
Just because I haven't ripped into the republican party as of yet doesn't mean I'm an advocate.
What you clearly DO see is that OUR election process in the USA can be just as much of a scam as anywhere else in the world....
just not when it comes to say, the likes of Bush being "voted" into office?
Glad to see you concede the point  unlike well you know.
|
|
skyscraper948
|
Jun 22 @ 3:11PM
|
|
|
Has someone lead you to believe that you are a practical and common sense individual?. Your a typical liberal. You provide no substantive facts only question those of others. You copy & paste materials with no bearng and or don't understand while acting as though you have the mental capacity to question someone elses substantive facts. The fact of the matter is that no matter what evidence is brought to bare your not here for practical debate your here to disrupt because you haven't the intellectual capacity to enter the debate.
I'm still waiting for these "substantive facts" you speak of so generously bestowing upon the MD blogging community.
|
|
Supremebeing412
|
Jun 22 @ 3:20PM
|
|
|
I'm still waiting for these "substantive facts" you speak of so generously bestowing upon the MD blogging community.
And I'm sure your mom and dad are waiting for the day you grow up and move out of the basement. Go away pest. When you have something worth contributing your welcome back until then try to be a man and respect my wishes.
|
|
skyscraper948
|
Jun 22 @ 3:35PM
|
|
|
And I'm sure your mom and dad are waiting for the day you grow up and move out of the basement. Go away pest. When you have something worth contributing your welcome back until then try to be a man and respect my wishes.
If you want to go away, you're gonna have to stop posting blogs with the half-truths, misleading information and outright lies that float around the message boards of sean hannity and rush limbaugh. Sorry. You post the blogs, not me. And if you post them, you should give people the opportunity to respond. You obviously don't like that, but what can i tell you... its a free country.
|
|
Supremebeing412
|
Jun 22 @ 4:03PM
|
|
|
If you want to go away, you're gonna have to stop posting blogs with the half-truths, misleading information and outright lies that
yeah, yeah, yeah. Half-truths, misleading and outright lies that you contested by irrelevant copy & paste of materials that not only you don't understand, have no bearing. Got it skycrapper . I'm a fraud and your the real thing. O.K., bye, bye. Seeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee-ya.
|
|
AngelLight
|
Jun 22 @ 4:22PM
|
|
Glad to see you concede the point unlike well you know.
I conceded? That's what happened?
"unlike well you know"......ah, ok, sure
Carry on!
|
|
Supremebeing412
|
Jun 22 @ 4:27PM
|
|
|
What you clearly DO see is that OUR election process in the USA can be just as much of a scam as anywhere else in the world....
The blog is about the 2008 election corruption. Are you not saying in the above that you agree that corruption exist and existed in the 2008 election?, Yes or no?
|
|
dizzydoll
|
Jun 22 @ 6:11PM
|
|
|
or perhaps youre not bum-buddies who knows?
|
|
Herodotus
|
Jun 23 @ 1:23AM
|
|
A rational approach
|
|
Supremebeing412
|
Jun 23 @ 9:23PM
|
|
|
rational approach
|
|
AngelLight
|
Jun 24 @ 12:31PM
|
|
|
On Jun 22 @ 4:27PM you quote me ~
What you clearly DO see is that OUR election process in the USA can be just as much of a scam as anywhere else in the world....
You then state ~
The blog is about the 2008 election corruption. Are you not saying in the above that you agree that corruption exist and existed in the 2008 election?, Yes or no?
This blog is about more than "the 2008 election corruption." You say "the 2008 election corruption" is what it is about yet I see more than that. I am saying that I agree with you on one significant point and that is "What makes our election process in the USA less corrupt than the one in Iran or in any other place in the world?" Is our process ALWAYS corrupt? Perhaps. Perhaps not. Do I think Obama is an "illegal" President? No I don't, but I will not give a dissertation here about why I do believe Obama was fairly elected.
If I am wrong, so be it.
You believe 2008 was corrupt.....I ask you to recall the 2004 election when Bush was "voted" into office following the "Florida fiasco." You refer to Obama as being "our illegal President." I am asking how is it that you process Obama as being elected "illegally" but do not see the 2004 "election" of Bush as illegal when referring to corruption?
You reference our media as significantly effecting corruption in terms of what is or is not reported.....I agree with that too. However, you are aware that (Keith) Rupert Murdoch owns the vast majority of the entire world news media? And that he is notoriously known for his republican/conservative slant and "secretive" involvement in politics....have you ever seen the documentary "Outfoxed?" as just one example? I have, and I have also watched Fox 5 news....the documentary is right on!
(Taken directly from "Wikipedia")
"The film examines the global growth of Murdoch's media enterprise in the context of concentration of media ownership considerations, and argues that having one person in control of a large media conglomerate might infringe freedom of the press. Outfoxed negatively portrays Fox News on several fronts:
It criticizes Fox News' coverage during the lead-up to, and the aftermath of, the 2003 invasion of Iraq.
It claims that commentators such as Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity attempt to intimidate guests with whom they disagree, such as author and activist Jeremy Glick.
It states that more airtime and coverage is given to Republican politicians, particularly those in the George W. Bush administration, than to Democrats.
It claims that Fox News' premature calling of the result of the 2000 presidential election contributed to George W. Bush officially being elected, and alleges that Bush may not actually have won the election.
It portrays Fox News management, including Murdoch and president Roger Ailes, both conservatives, as controlling the network's content, and further portrays editorial control from Murdoch on down as ensuring which stories and issues are covered and that the coverage is from a strongly conservative perspective.
It asserts that suspensions or other reprisals are given to reporters and producers for not promoting the channel's political point of view. It states that it picks strong confident conservatives and weak-looking complacent liberals to appear on it."
Watch Fox 5 news, if you don't already. Watch "Outfoxed" if you haven't already. And then, just as one example, keep watching Fox 5 news and see what you see.
Oh, and btw, I'm still waiting for you to "rip into the Republican party."
|
|
|