The Climate Change Swindle has been exposed...This video is quite entertaining as the Lord Monckton is a man with quite a sense of humor!..Watch this..and be free of false crisis's..lies...and unscientific freedom destroying nonsense....
BE FREE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THE GLOBAL WARMING SCARE IS OVER...ITS A HOAX...PROOF POSITIVE!
Copy & paste to friend: (Click inside box; Ctrl + C to copy; Ctrl + V to paste)
|
|
read more blogs!
Blogs by musicianfriend:
|
|
|
|
|
| THE SCIENCE IS IN....THE TRUTH IS OUT...THE SCARE IS OVER... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wing_Zero_75
|
Oct 29 @ 11:58PM
|
|
Im watching it now. Uhoh.......hes white so he must be racist. He doesnt believe in global warming, so he must be a republican......oh wait, hes British. ummmmm
Thats all I got. 
Larry
|
|
musicianfriend
|
Oct 30 @ 12:11AM
|
|
Hey Larry! Hows it going!
Good movie huh....I am astounded at the lies that have been pushed on the people of the world...and the people who have been starved to death by these heartless baztards... 
They must think we are stupid idiots to beleive their crap....what a bunch of liars! Wow...amazing!
|
|
SweetNapaGuy
|
Oct 30 @ 12:38AM
|
|
|
Yes, because politicians know SO MUCH more about climate change than people who actually have a deep grounding in science. I suppose next you'll consult a plumber to perform an appendectomy on you...?
|
|
Wing_Zero_75
|
Oct 30 @ 1:34AM
|
|
Wow. I just finished watching the whole thing. Now I have about 2 and a half pages of notes to look up. What I did look up while listening to him was proved beyond a shadow of a doubt. Looks like this country is super duper f*cked in december when obama signs.
If this world thinks that some peice of paper will EVER trump the constitution, they have another thing comming. We may get screwed with it for a few years, but that will last long.
It may be time to take up arms against the government that seeks to enslave us and make us apologize for being who and where we are.
Larry
|
|
snidegrass
|
Oct 30 @ 8:53AM
|
|
its obvious, fight global warming, stop breathing. carbon dioxide out, oxygen
in. air is mostly nitrogen anyway. stop breathing and die, more room
for me and mrs. robinson crusoe. planet earth, population 2, me and her.
thank you for dying.
|
|
POPO
|
Oct 30 @ 8:54AM
|
|
Hola TiTi...... 
The green machine is dying and the Global Warming bs is exposed so much, they had to change the name to climate change.... What some idiots don't get is they were duped  Science has now proven there is no Global Warming, their is a slight weather change, that occurrs every so many years, The last 10 years have been the coldest on record. Even the thugs at the UN are realising they can no longer pretend their is a problem and make money from it. This is why Al Global Gore refuses to take questions any longer at his speaches, because people are armed with facts not liberal jibber to scare people, no longer can they get away with the were saving the planet crapola. People have educated them selves and realized it's a hoax for global tax and NWO.
Those who are brain washed will follow anything, those who have researched both sides of the arguement, clearly see the data doesn't line up with the propaganda that's being sold to the masses who believe what ever their told.But then again if you stand for nothing, you will fall for anything.  When people follow the money, they find the web and trail of deciet, designed to scare people and work on their emotions rather then common sense, many peeps actually think they are doing the right thing, promoting this garbage, they've been duped  But it makes them feel all caring and sensitive...  If Global Warming really was a problem their would be solid evidence to support it, but even the data the so called experts have collected has been refuted by their peers.(other scientist) who have even shown the data and machines used to collect the data was mis read and were slanted to fit agendas for more funding, to scare people into paying more taxs. It's a croc.... 
The naysayers can say anything but prove nothing, they can not prove that those who disagree are wrong, and if their wrong how so?  All they can spew is you don't care about the planet and you must be a republican, that proves nothing and shows they don't have a leg to stand on. If it was truly science, scientist would agree, they don't...  Many liberals are now seeing the light and know it was a hoax.
|
|
Sternfan69
|
Oct 30 @ 8:54AM
|
|
The British writer and environmentalist George Monbiot has criticized Monckton's arguments, labelling them "cherry-picking, downright misrepresentation and pseudo-scientific gibberish."[12] In response, Monckton argued that he "got the science right", claiming that Monbiot got "too many facts wrong" and had shown "ignorance of the elementary physics".[13]
During the autumn of 2009, Monckton embarked on a tour of North America to campaign against the December 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference. His warning that US President Barack Obama intended to sign a treaty at the conference which would "impose a communist world government on the world" was picked up by numerous commentators on the American right and "rocketed around the fringe" of right-wing websites, prompting Glenn Beck to invite him on his radio show again. Writing in Salon, Alex Koppelman criticized Monckton's assertions about the conference's framework for negotiation as being "woefully inaccurate. And that's a nice way of putting it." [21][22] The St. Petersburg Times's PolitiFact.com described his assertions as "not only unsupported but preposterous" and awarded him a special rating of "britches on fire".[23] Ethan Baron of the Canadian newspaper The Province criticized Monckton's assertions as the product of a "whacked-out, far-right ideology, combined with an ego the size of the Antarctic ice sheet."[24]
American Physical Society article on climate sensitivity
In July 2008 Monckton wrote an article about climate sensitivity for the American Physical Society's Forum on Physics and Society.[25][26], concluding: "it is very likely that in response to a doubling of pre-industrial carbon dioxide concentration [surface temperature] will rise not by the 3.26 °K [sic] suggested by the IPCC, but by <1 °K."
Some media commentators interpreted the publication of his paper as a sign that the American Physical Society had abandoned its earlier support for the scientific consensus on climate change.[27] In response, the APS reaffirmed its unchanged position on climate change and pointed out that the newsletter of the APS Forum on Physics and Society "carries the statement that 'Opinions expressed are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of the APS or of the Forum.' This newsletter is not a journal of the APS and it is not peer reviewed."[28] The APS further added a disclaimer to the top of Monckton's article stating: "...Its conclusions are in disagreement with the overwhelming opinion of the world scientific community. The Council of the American Physical Society disagrees with this article's conclusions."[29] In a response[30], Monckton called the APS "red flag" "discourteous" and claimed his paper had been "scientifically reviewed in meticulous detail". Notwithstanding, Arthur Smith, long-time member at the APS Forum, has identified 125 errors, irrelevancies, and contradictions in the article.[31][32]
Views on AIDS
Monckton's views on how the AIDS epidemic should be tackled have been the subject of some controversy. In an article entitled "The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS", written for the January 1987 issue of The American Spectator, he argued that "there is only one way to stop AIDS. That is to screen the entire population regularly and to quarantine all carriers of the disease for life. Every member of the population should be blood-tested every month ... all those found to be infected with the virus, even if only as carriers, should be isolated compulsorily, immediately, and permanently." This would involve isolating between 1.5 and 3 million people in the United States ("not altogether impossible") and another 30,000 people in the UK ("not insuperably difficult").[39]
Monckton appeared on the BBC's Panorama programme in February 1987 to discuss his views and present the results of an opinion poll that found public support for his position.[34] In 1999 the British gay rights group OutRage! launched a campaign to force the manufacturer of Monckton's Eternity Puzzle to disassociate itself from him because of his views.[40] Monckton has since clarified his views on AIDS, stating that "the article was written at the very outset of the AIDS epidemic, and with 33 million people around the world now infected, the possibility of [quarantine] is laughable. It couldn't work."[41]
read the last part,,,seems he was wrong about his initial theory on aids,,,guess that makes it more than possible he is wrong about any number of things,,,but nice try,,
|
|
|