Free Dating

Document surfaces- Michelle Obama has been funneling tax dollars to daughters

posted 12/20/2016 6:28:38 PM |
9 kudosgive kudos what's this?
    report abuse

Newly uncovered classified documents show that Michelle Obama has been ripping off U.S. taxpayers for the past 8 years. Not only has she fleeced us by taking numerous extravagant vacations but she also did funneled money to her mother and daughters who were with her during these trips by listing them as “Senior Staff.”

According to an Air Force flight passenger manifest for the multi-million dollar trip, which included multiple days of sightseeing and a family safari, Michelle listed her daughters as “Senior Staff.” White House officials told True Pundit that as senior staff on an official diplomatic trip, Sasha and Malia could have also been paid a daily stipend in addition to the free flight, lodging, meals, sight seeing and safari.

Read more

Copy & paste to friend: (Click inside box; Ctrl + C to copy; Ctrl + V to paste)

   read more blogs!

Blogs by Willy_3411:
Touchdown Pass of the Year
Vladimir Putin Publicly Calls Democrats “SORE LOSERS”
62% - of Democrats - hope they're done with Hillary Clinton as a candidate
Chronic Complainers
About the election. From Ted Nugent
Document surfaces- Michelle Obama has been funneling tax dollars to daughters
Warning to Democrats: The rules have changed
Sorry, left: Electoral College does its job in spite of your attempts to thwart
Denmark 2006
Sheriff Arpaio Gives Evidence Proves Obama’s Birth Certificate Is “Fraud"


Dec 20 @ 9:11PM  
This is a prime example of 'faux news'. American Freedom Fighters is the website with numerous stories, none of which are verifiable. Dean James posts only on FB, claiming to be the 'head writer' for AFF, but has been debunked even by That's a site where rdl gets most of the news stories he furnishes as factual news. The name AFF Gets it name from comic book characters.

Dec 20 @ 11:18PM  
Harvard and Mayo-Clint have a security problem, Willy, Diamond, TTom and few others have escaped and running free at large. when spotted, steer clear for it was concluded they had nothing between the ears to study---all junk

Dec 21 @ 5:25AM  
Has there been a more corrupt administration than this one?

Dec 21 @ 10:57AM  
this seems to be far too typical...

willy reposts a faux news blurb as truth..

occasionally a brain cell surfaces from the right... and debunks it..

but an Obama hater says .."so what... they are corrupt because....

Faux news told me they were...

to answer Lady about town...

the shrub years... where BILLIONS disappeared into that sink hole called

Shrubs war on terror.... creating a war in countries that were not part nor parcel to 9-11 as revenge and retribution...

based on a false flag operation.. where the owner of the towers was paid private insurance companies...

[QUOTE]The Great 9/11 Insurance Bonanza
March 26, 2010 Comments

OpEd News
March 26, 2010
“An Insurance Policy that had been set up for the WTC Complex only weeks before the Twin Towers went down” says Investigative Journalist Laurence De Mello.
Larry Silverstein – “The Harder I Worked The Luckier I Became”
De Mello continues, “In 1980, ... real estate tycoon Silverstein, won a bid from the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey to construct 7 World Trade Center to the north of the WTC. Building 7 World Trade Center was situated above a (Con Ed) power substation, which imposed unique structural design constraints.”
When the building first opened in 1987, Silverstein had difficulties attracting tenants. In 1988, Salomon Brothers signed a long-term lease, and became the main tenants of the building.

But this building was also losing money. Silverstein was interested in acquiring the entire World Trade Center complex, and put in a bid when the Port Authority put it up for lease in 2000. (he had waited over 20 years for this!).

In January 2001, Silverstein, via Silverstein Properties, made a $3.2 billion bid for the lease to the World Trade Center. Silverstein was initially outbid by $50 million by Boston Properties and Brookfield Properties with Vornado Realty, who were also competing for the lease”. Silverstein won the bid when a deal between the initial lease applicant and the Port Authority fell through, Silverstein signed the lease on July 24, 2001, only weeks (48 days) before the towers were destroyed on 11th September of the same year.

Larry Silverstein had acquired what was considered a very expensive ”white elephant”. Here comes a Red Flag; After Silverstein closed his deal he stated; “This is a dream come true,” “We will be in control of a prized asset, and we will seek to develop its potential, raising it to new heights.”

Yet this was a comment that was meant to make the public think this was a good investment. He didn’t want to draw attention to the fact that he was buying the dead asset which the WTC was immediately before 9/11. Why ? Because he already knew what was going to happen!

This was written in “‘Business week” with regard to the WTC before 9/11. From an economic standpoint, the Trade Center — subsidized since its inception — has never functioned, nor was it intended to function, unprotected in the rough-and-tumble real estate marketplace.

The Port Authority had made several attempts over the years to get the permits required to demolish the entire site but were always refused because of the “asbestos problem” and the serious danger that “asbestos” would cause to the local community should the buildings be “demolished” in the conventional manner.

His only consent to get around that risk to health was that the building could be literally dismantled “‘floor by floor”, which could never have been a viable operation. Other New York developers had apparently been driven to bankruptcy by the costly mandated renovations and the prospect of $200 million to plug those losses, which represented an entire year’s worth of revenues from the World Trade Towers at full rental capacity.
So even after Larry Silverstein’s multi billion dollar acquisition in July of 2001 the Towers still required further funds of some $200 million in renovations and improvements to make the buildings rentable. Most of the 200 million renovation funds related to the removal and replacement of building materials declared to be health hazards in the years since the towers were built.
Here we see a Red Flag; Where would that money have come from if Silverstein already had to invest 14 million of his own money to close the deal? This 14 million of Silverstein’s personal funds being used in the deal tells us there was no more investors money available when he bought the lease in July 2002, so how would Silverstein have found another 200 million dollars to bring the WTC up to the standard for it to start to pay its own way?

Red Flag; One has to ask why would the biggest real estate developer in the USA acquire a group of buildings that were losing hundreds of thousands of dollars per month? Especially as this new lease did not give him the right to redevelop the WTC site to make it a viable investment.
Now here’s the interesting clause to the 99 year lease that was “‘turning Silverstein on”; although Silverstein was not permitted to redevelop the site, HE DID HAVE THE RIGHT TO REBUILD THE STRUCTURES SHOULD THEY BE DESTROYED.
Now remember, Silverstein invested not only 3.2 billion dollars of other people’s money into the deal, but also 14 million dollars of his own money! Now that’s a very unusual investment step to take by a real estate genius, putting all that money into a site that was continuously a monumental financial loss.
A site that can never be developed in a way that was financially feasible! How does one justify that move to ones 3.2 billion dollar investors? I would love to have seen the Business Plan for that! We should certainly ask for those!
After closing the WTC deal in late July 2001, Silverstein immediately insured his “‘white elephant” buildings. The insurance coverage on the property ‘fortuitously’ covered acts of terrorism.
And more curiously, Silverstein filed TWO insurance claims for the maximum amount of the policy, based on the two, in Silverstein’s view, separate attacks.
The total potential payout was $7.1 billion, more than enough to build a fabulous new complex and leave a hefty profit for the Silverstein Group, including Larry Silverstein himself.

From 6th Dec 2004, “A federal jury on Monday ruled that the assault on the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center was in fact two occurrences for insurance purposes”.
The finding in U.S. District Court in Manhattan means leaseholder Larry Silverstein

Jan 9 @ 2:23AM  
What has happened to my fellow Americans that will believe any bit of shit that comes down the pike. There was a time when the President's family was hands off by comedians, dumb bloggers, and media reports.

Our country is going to hell in a hand basket at this rate.
mission statement | testimonials | safety warning | report abuse | safe list | privacy | legal | advertise | link to us

© Copyright 2000-2017 Online Singles, LLC.