AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Free Dating

Bible Archeology Pt 27

posted 4/27/2007 2:36:22 AM |
1 kudogive kudos what's this?
    report abuse
tagged: proof, bible, jehovah, god, science
  HopelesslyHopeful

Relative worth of inscriptions.

Thousands upon thousands of ancient inscriptions have been found and are being interpreted.

Albright states: “Written documents form by far the most important single body of material discovered by archaeologists. Hence it is extremely important to gain a clear idea of their character and of our ability to interpret them.” (The Westminster Historical Atlas to the Bible, p. 11) They may be written on broken pottery, clay tablets, papyrus, or carved in granite rock. Whatever the material, the information they convey must still be weighed and tested as to its reliability and worth. Error or outright falsehood can be and frequently has been set down in stone as well as on paper.—See CHRONOLOGY (Bible Chronology and Secular History); SARGON.

As an illustration, the Bible record states that King Sennacherib of Assyria was killed by his two sons, Adrammelech and Sharezer, and was succeeded to the throne by another son, Esar-haddon. (2Ki 19:36, 37)

Yet, a Babylonian chronicle stated that, on the 20th of Tebeth, Sennacherib was killed by his son in a revolt. Both Berossus, Babylonian priest of the third century B.C.E., and Nabonidus, Babylonian king of the sixth century B.C.E., gave the same account, to the effect that Sennacherib was assassinated by only one of his sons.

However, in a more recently discovered fragment of the Prism of Esar-haddon, the son who succeeded Sennacherib, Esar-haddon clearly states that his brothers (plural) revolted and killed their father and then took flight. Commenting on this, Philip Biberfeld, in Universal Jewish History (1948, Vol. I, p. 27), says: “The Babylonian Chronicle, Nabonid, and Berossus were mistaken; only the Biblical account proved to be correct.

It was confirmed in all the minor details by the inscription of Esarhaddon and proved to be more accurate regarding this event of Babylonian-Assyrian history than the Babylonian sources themselves. This is a fact of utmost importance for the evaluation of even contemporary sources not in accord with Biblical tradition.”

Copy & paste to friend: (Click inside box; Ctrl + C to copy; Ctrl + V to paste)

   read more blogs!

Blogs by HopelesslyHopeful:
Apocrypha (or Apocryphia)
Something to read BEFORE your bachelor party jumps into full swing!
Here's a simple equation even a misogynist can relate to:
Now here's a scam for you!
Wishes and dreams (with proper links)
Daily Bible Reading:
Wishes and dreams:
It's a comment:
Is it a full moon?
Interesting:
Rhetorical Blog (answer if you must, but I'd rather you question)
Bible Archeology Pt 28
Bible Archeology Pt 27
Bible Archeology Pt 26
Bible Archeology Pt 25
Bible Archeology Pt 24
Bible Archeology Pt 23
Bible Archeology Pt 22
Bible Archeology Pt 21
Bible Archeology Pt 20
Bible Archeology Pt 19
Bible Archeology Pt 18
Bible Archeology Pt 17
Bible Archeology Pt 16
Biblical Archeology Pt 15


No comments yet, be the first to post a comment!
free adult dating | mission statement | testimonials | safety warning | report abuse | safe list | privacy | legal | advertise | link to us

© Copyright 2000-2008 Online Singles, LLC.
WEB2
Bible Archeology Pt 27