And what does she do .... criticize the President 
-
I listened to the President's response .... I thought I was going to faint - it seemed like he was politicking for her ... praise and more praise
-
Of course she lacks the class and integrity to do anything but act like she does: complain, whine, moan, socialistic views on American, though she's right in there voting to go to war when necessary
-
But then again ... that's the way of the "PROGRESSIVES" ... criticize and complain, though they owned oil and medical stocks
-
INSTEAD of listing the points, laying out a plan, and demonstrating leadership 
and of course I wouldn't have to post this blog, had I been able to leave a comment, which only included the first point
Copy & paste to friend: (Click inside box; Ctrl + C to copy; Ctrl + V to paste)
|
|
read more blogs!
Blogs by sparechange64:
|
|
|
|
|
| Hillary begins TV ad campaign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHYBLONDE48
|
Aug 16 @ 11:33PM
|
|
|
Im not sure why the candidates criticize the president and other candidates. I dont want to hear about all the things the other candidates are doing wrong I want to know what the candidates that is critiing is going to outside.
|
|
hereshannon
|
Aug 16 @ 11:43PM
|
|
|
Hillary was correct in her recent campaign ad, there are without a doubt people in this country who are "invisible" to the administration. It's a sad state of affairs when the wealthiest nation in the world allows 45 million of their citizens to go without healthcare. All in the name of corporate greed, and political corruption!
|
|
LongRanger278
|
Aug 16 @ 11:44PM
|
|
Unfortunatley thats how these people attempt to get ahead. Have no record of achievement themselves so what's left to do other then complain about the other side. Face it, if Hillary Clinton was a quality candidate what need would there be to
bash the current President?
|
|
justlkn853
|
Aug 16 @ 11:46PM
|
|
|
I Will Vote For Hilary....
|
|
ambient_silence
|
Aug 16 @ 11:59PM
|
|
I am amazed that the two of you don't think its right that the President should be criticised if its warranted. I appreciate you have a different system there and that Bush would stand down irrespective of how good or bad he has been but how is she expected to differentiate herself if she doesn't explain why.
As for voting for the War I do have many doubts about her because of that as I have with our own unelected Prime Minister. As for the rest of her behaviour isn't that the same as any politician?Trying to score points and evade answering questions?
PS Why do you guys call everyone marginally to the left of attila the Hun a Socialist? Even management recognises the dirrent styles of consenual (Democrat) and rule by fear (Republican). They both fully support the same economic system.
|
|
hereshannon
|
Aug 17 @ 12:30AM
|
|
|
Looks like you only "approve" responses to your blog that agree with what you have to say. Kind of like the way the communist party operates! Sad.
|
|
enigmasrook
|
Aug 17 @ 2:12AM
|
|
|
Mudslinging is not a new concept. Both parties use it equally as well. Some start years before the election to denigrate possible front runners. Should it happen...no...but it is SOP. I didn't see the ad in question so can't offer my opinion.
|
|
Hansumm
|
Aug 17 @ 12:29PM
|
|
Hi lone,.....I apologize for objecting since i do agreee with many of our ideas, but I feel somewhat quailfied to reply. My background is media...and spent nearly 30 years in that industry.
Basic campaign strategy is to always say that you are going to be better, and to be honest, the current administration is a very easy way to garner votes. Folks will always listen, if they are unhappy with the current situation. It's plain common sense. It is basic marketing 101....
It's sort of standard operating procedure. I doubt that there is a candidate alive that never touted that they would be a better president and of course, you have to establish how and why..
Those decisions ususlly come out of the mill, and not so much the candidate. Oh...who created this media monster?....the people of course. I always despised those sensationalistic cheap headline grabbing publications that you see in the market, but it would not exist, if the people didn''t want it. Business tends to follow the money and the money always comes from the people.
Not a nice total picture, but unfortunately it pains me to say that is the reality the people created. I think it is a negative by product of our society, and I wish it were not so, but it is.
|
|
sparechange64
|
Aug 17 @ 6:14PM
|
|
quoting "Hillary was correct in her recent campaign ad"
so she's running against gw then eh she couldn't simply state her position on the past and foolishly points the finger at ONE president
as far as your second comment pathetic that you wouldn't think some people actually have a life and do not spend hours upon hours scouring the blogs
THE WHOLE point folks is this: this was a grandstanding effort by hillary in an ATTEMPT to make bush look bad
HER HUSBAND was president for 8 years - why shouldn't she blame him
AND ANOTHER THING: WHY DO THEY KEEP GIVING FREE HEALTHCARE TO ILLEGALS ... it might be easier to raise the bar a little for REAL AMERICANS
|
|
LongRanger278
|
Aug 18 @ 1:18AM
|
|
|
It's plain common sense. It is basic marketing 101....
Where not selling Pepsi Hansumm. I was insinuating that gifted and sincere people
don't need shock media / advertising. A gifted actor/ actress doesn't need shock media. A gifted composer doesn't need shock media. Hillary needs it because she hasn't done a damn thing since she's been in politic's and she knows that. She can't use her record as a politician as advertisement. Thats what cracks me up about these people. They have to slice into someone else because they have done nothing.
|
|
Hansumm
|
Aug 18 @ 2:22AM
|
|
Lone...idealistically no they should not have to use this sort of tactics and you are right, but realistically it is selling pepsi or whatever. These same people that vote, also are the same people that do buy pepsi or whatever. They are also the same people that read those dumb rag publications at the grocery checkstand.
The majority of the public is not informed as you might already have a guessed and it is just the way it is. Idealistcally the men running for public offices should have a moral test, and IQ test as most large corporations handle their hiring. Idealistically a man like Bush should never have become President. Seriously, he was a good time charlie in college and most corporations will look at these type of qualilties when it comes filling executive positions.
I doubt the Bush has the intellect that many of folks like you and several others I seen here on MD, but we live in the real world, where you have to appeal to masses, since they are the one's voting.
Unfortunatley, many people think Bush is a genius. I would have much sooner voted for you than him. You obviously did better than D's in college than he did. Yes, he had C's, but i am sure his families influence was an asset from even graduating from college. That sort of lack of commitment in college would never fly if trying for high managment position with any large corporation. If you notice, he always seem to have that same lack of commitment when it came to so many other situations, like the bombing on 9/11 or the katrina disaster just to name two.
What is bizarre, is his commitment to the war. I don't believe we ever saw Bush commit so strongly to anything before. It leaves me with so many questions as to why?
Idealistically i agree whole heartily with you, but in reality, we buy pepsi and believe it is refreshing despite it's real negative value to the human health.
Who decides how people want to be influenced..the people do. Again, sad but true.
|
|
kv
|
Aug 23 @ 9:27AM
|
|
|
Maybe Bush was a good time Charley in College, and maybe he was like a lot of students who didn't study as hard as they should have knowing they were going to pass the course because they knew the material. What I find unfair is how its ok to bash Bush for his pat but you can give the Clinton's a pass. At least Bush didnt turn the white house into his own private brothel like somebody we all know. Thats why you cant trust Hillary if she would stand still for that crap because she wanted to stay in the white house how can you trust her to do anything but further her own agenda
|
|
|