The following is the transcript for the video clip of Rev. Dr. Jeremiah Wright, the head pastor of the Trinity United Church of Christ -- the cult to which Hussein Obama is a member.
This pastor aspires and supports Hussein Obama. This pastor heads a “church” which is recognized by the Federal Government as a tax-exempt organization, but nonetheless, is using the pulpit to support the liberal political agenda (i.e the church, Hussein Obama's church, is breaking the law).
The link to the video clip is found after the italic type followed by one other link that has three audio clips of the same pastor you should all listen to.
….people have to put up with who cares about what a poor black man has to face everyday, in a country, in a culture controlled by rich white people.
Somebody missed that. You got nervous ‘cause we have some white members here. I am still in bible country, I am still in the text.
Jesus was a poor black man who lived in a country, and who lived in a culture that was controlled by rich white people. The Romans were rich. The Romans were Italian, which means they were Europeans, which means they were white, and the Romans ran everything in Jesus’ country.
It just came to me with-with-with-within the past few weeks ya’ll why so many folk are hatin’ o’ Barak Obama.
He doesn’t fit the model.
He ain’t white.
He ain’t rich.
And he ain’t privileged.
Hillary fits the mold. Europeans fit the mold. Giuliani fits the mold. Rich white men fit the mold.
Hillary never had a cab whiz past her and not pick her up because her skin was the wrong color.
Hillary never had to worry about being pulled over in her car as a black man driving in the wrong……..I’m sick of Negros that just do not get it.
Hillary was not a black boy raised in a single parent home, Barak was. Barak knows what it means to be a black man living in a country, in a culture that is controlled by rich white people.
Hillary can never know that.
Hillary ain’t never been called a Nigger.
Hillary has never had a people defined as a [non-person?].
Hilliary ain’t had to work twice as hard just to get accepted by the rich white folk who run everything, or to get a passing grade when you know you are smarter than that “C-student” sitting in the white house.
Oh, I am so glad that I got a god who knows what it is to be a poor black man in a country, in a culture, that is controlled by and run by rich white people.
He taught me, Jesus did, how to love my enemies. Jesus taught me how to love the hell out of my enemies. And not be reduced to their level of hatred, bigotry and small mindedness.
Hillary ain’t never had her own people say she wunn’t white enough.
Jesus had his own people siding with the enemy. That is why I love Jesus, ya’ll. He never let their hatred dampin’ his hope.
There is a name I love to hear….
[end of clip]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hAYe7MT5BxM
**
In addition, you have to listen to these three clips at the following link. Hussein Obama, his church and his pastor are anti-American.
http://www.michaelsavage.com/jeramiah-speech-two.html
**
Hussein Obama is not a smart man, nor is he a stupid man. I just think his supporters are stupid. Hussein Obama is, however, a dangerous man for this country because his views mirror that of his so-called pastor, as well as the view of Louis Farrakhan, as well as the views of Islamic totalitarian states overseas.
He continues to be given a pass by the mainstream media, in hopes that the People will remain ignorant of his true beliefs, his associations and his sentiments towards America. Hussein Obama has international support from organizations such as FARQ, CAIR, socialist dictators from Latin American countries, foreign Muslim organizations thoughout Europe and the Persian Gulf countries. This alone is evidence that the liberal party will sell us out just to get a democrat in White House. And if these things don't disturb you, but you continue to blindly support Hussein Obama, then I wouldn't just call you stupid, I'd say you'd have a serious mental disorder.
.
.
.
Copy & paste to friend: (Click inside box; Ctrl + C to copy; Ctrl + V to paste)
|
|
read more blogs!
Blogs by Exsecratus_Sicarius:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| The Soul of Hussein Obama's Campaign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ginstl
|
Mar 13 @ 9:33PM
|
|
|
The whole world is caught in a power grab right now caused by different men all with equally worthless agenda's.
|
|
SouthernGator
|
Mar 13 @ 10:47PM
|
|
And Hussein Obama says and I quote off Fox news...."people will not let race affect their judgement as to who they vote for. they will vote issues".
And they thought Bill didnt inhale...What the heck is this guy smoking to believe that......98% of blacks are voting for him. Yeah right they are voting because of issues. What would be said if 98% of whites voted for Hillary or John Mccain?
It would be said your racist. Well if this country wants to go to war with the rest of the world.........VOTE Obama. If Obama wins....were screwed. I dont really like Hillary but I would vote for her before I even CONSIDERED Obama. Guess i will vote Mccain. Aint least he wont screw us like this last administration did with fuel costs.
|
|
PROVIDENCE_BOSTON
|
Mar 14 @ 6:07AM
|
|
The mans FIRST name is Barack.
Your not using it in your blog shows me that you are a racist and that you are simply trying to slander the man.
Shame on you.
|
|
legacy1
|
Mar 14 @ 7:19AM
|
|
Right Providence....total ignorance. Like I mentioned before just because the man's middle name is Hussein means absolutely nothing here.....I have family that have the last name is Castro...do we smuggle cigars and support communism?...some peoples kids.
Fact is the repubs know their fate is sealed in 08'! How McCain didn't tell his party to f*** off after what they did to him in 2000 is beyond me? I love to see Sean Hannity and the bitch Ann Coulter eat crow & support a man they totally didn't want to the get the party's nomination......Bye Bye Repubs.....maybe in 2012?
|
|
Exsecratus_Sicarius
|
Mar 14 @ 8:47AM
|
|
|
The mans FIRST name is Barack. Your not using it in your blog shows me that you are a racist and that you are simply trying to slander the man.
Pardon me,
IT'S HIS NAME!
Slander the man by calling him by his name?
ROFL
Since you're big on names, here are the meanings of his Allah-inspired name:
[Blessed by (Allah)]=Barak/Baraq/Barack;
[Beautiful/Handsome]=Hussein;
Obama.
.
.
.
Is that better?
.
.
.
Your not using it in your blog shows me that you are a racist and that you are simply trying to slander the man.
Did you even read the blog?
Hussein Obama IS a racist! How could you not see this?
This Rev. Wright has been close to Hussein Obama for +20 years.
He wed the Obamas.
"The Audacity of Hope", the title of one of Hussein Obama's books, is the title of one of Rev. Wright's sermons.
Hussein Obama loves this Rev. Wright.
Did you listen to the 4 stand-alone audio clips on that second link I provided?
.
.
.
.
You can't be that hateful towards America to willfully ignore this, could you?
.
.
Oh, nevermind. I just noted you're "very liberal" on your profile. So yes, you could.
.
.
But hey, if it takes a pro-infanticide, pro-jihadi, anti-semitic, anti-American, Muslim & very racist politician to give you the money that other people have earned, then more power to you.
.
.
Anything for a few more "government handouts", eh lib?
.
.
.
|
|
Exsecratus_Sicarius
|
Mar 14 @ 8:59AM
|
|
|
Right Providence....total ignorance. Like I mentioned before just because the man's middle name is Hussein means absolutely nothing here
It means nothing to non-muslims here within the United States.
It means EVERYTHING to muslims EVERYWHERE.
Read about the Muslim Birth Rites.
Read the Qur'an about Muslim births. Males are given credit to giving birth not women (women in Islam are not given credit of child-birth because they're considere 1/2 the value of a Muslim man), and because of this, "apostasy" for women is not as severe as it is for men (for this reason, Hussein Obama's mother's religion is insignificant).
Understand that when men/women convert to Islam, they adopt an Allah-inspired name -- identifying their superiority over all other people.
.
.
Now, what were you saying about ignorance?
.
.
Did you even watch that clip of the sermon from the [racist] pastor -- the pastor that the [racist] Hussein Obama admires?
.
.
.
|
|
mordru
|
Mar 14 @ 1:41PM
|
|
|
E.S Shame on you for engaging in a battle of wits,with a couple of unarmed persons.
|
|
observed50
|
Mar 14 @ 4:43PM
|
|
mordru> If you're thinkin someone is armed in this battle, I sure would encourage you to stand on the other side of the hill, because the weapons come without warranty, guaranty, instructions, and seemingly are constructed of used, worn knock-off parts. Lots of marketing bluff, but no quality assurance or firepower.
Ideology is never good weapons. Its simply good blinders.
|
|
mordru
|
Mar 14 @ 4:48PM
|
|
|
Observed,Our founding fathers had a pretty good ideology that the liberal left is trying its damndest to destroy.And E.S. arms are pretty well made made.Now let the liberal name calling begin.
|
|
PROVIDENCE_BOSTON
|
Mar 14 @ 5:15PM
|
|
|
Shame on you for engaging in a battle of wits,with a couple of unarmed persons
You always have something stupid to say dragon boy . You make more inane comments then anyone here .
Stay on topic .My comments were that Obama's first name be used. Anybody with at least a pea brain can see why the poster has NOT used Barack's first name .
Evidently,you cannot see that.
|
|
observed50
|
Mar 14 @ 5:22PM
|
|
Mord> The Founding Fathers, white and purty as they were, some slave holders and believing only property owners were of value, didn't come with ideology, though they were the most liberal thing to emerge as leadership to that moment in history. They hammered out a path on how a society might function together better than societies had to that point. They represented the lives of many, of difference, with different perspectives on many things, but they knew that they had to get to the future together...
something never present as a perception in such blogs as this...ideology always believes it can get there alone.
And for the record, it has never been a right wing in any nation who have fought to live up to 'all men are created equal' or 'right to free speech' or any of the other 'rights' outlined in the Bill of Rights. The Right Wing has always been about the limitation of rights, the maintenance of status quo, the insistence on yesterday was better than today. Right wing in any society has been about 'reaction' to change, reaction to the march of history in its many forms that don't permit us to still think powdering wigs and using slaves is appropriate.
It isn't a liberal left that seeks to destroy anything. Its the mindset that somehow or another, people can live today like they did yesterday, not listening to voices of difference, different perspectives and experiences of the same historical moment, or thinking somehow or another, they are the key holders of truth. Our arrogance as a nation is grounded in our great arrogance as a people, which is always deeply rooted in our fear - of the future, of change, of each other.
The answer...wrap ourselves in self-righteous ideology and fail to see again and again that every time we point a finger at the other...three point right back at us.
The Founding Fathers recognized the need to get to the future together. Ever hear talk radio in its blathering have such an insight? Ever hear Ann Coulter and her sheep bleat about getting to the future together?
If we aren't doin it together, no matter how hard we try to hide behind Founding Fathers, ancient documents and texts, all we are really is sniveling children afraid of the dark, hiding behind dusty skirts...
|
|
mordru
|
Mar 14 @ 5:28PM
|
|
Does you future together want a world goverment? Are you willing to sell out America? Remember Rome fell not so much from the outside,but from within.Those who are willing to sell us out will bring about our down fall. 
|
|
diverdown512
|
Mar 14 @ 5:39PM
|
|
|
You've found a forum that can really make a difference in your war on Islam. You're reaching literally HUNDREDS of middle aged singles whose biggest concerns are erectile dysfunction and hot flashes. Assemble the troops!
|
|
Exsecratus_Sicarius
|
Mar 14 @ 5:43PM
|
|
|
Stay on topic .My comments were that Obama's first name be used. Anybody with at least a pea brain can see why the poster has NOT used Barack's first name .
Evidently,you cannot see that.
Courteously reminding you, ProvB, the [topic] here:
1) racist Hussein Obama...oh, pardon me, racist {blessed by (alla) --handsome/beautiful -- obama} (these are the meanings of the allah-inspired names)
2) Hussein Obama's mentor of 20 years
3) the video/audio clips about the poor & unpriveleged Hussein Obama
4) his, his pastor of 20 years and his wife's negative sentiments towards America (America the horrible which deserves everything that's happened to it from 9/11 to present)
But please, as you can see, my posts are always open for comments by anyone.
So you can post what ever you'd like. You can even post Hussein Obama's first name repeatedly as the only thing you'd post if that would make you feel better.
But what is very disturbing about you, Sir, is that I have brought up a topic which can be highly offfensive to many people (black, white or poka-dot), but yet, the only problem you see with this post is the fact that I did not use the first name of this pro-infanticide, pro-palestinian, anti-semitic, racist & Muslim politician that passionately hates America and all she stands for???
[nevermind his harvard education, his US Senate seat, his book deals and illegal realestate deal]
Hussein Obama preaches hate; sentiments shared with his pastor of 20 years.
For this reason alone, he relates so well to the liberal trash of this country (because you and your kind also hate America -- at least until She gives you all something that She takes from those who produce).
Liberals are the most extreme type of whores of all time.
They would elect anyone/anything just to get a few "free" things in return (and not realizing for a second that doing so would erode whatever liberty you once had).
.
.
.
|
|
mordru
|
Mar 14 @ 5:56PM
|
|
Prov'b Your just jealous that Hussein Obama and yourself are not as witty. 
|
|
mordru
|
Mar 14 @ 6:06PM
|
|
Again the liberals resort to name calling.Thanks PROV,You represent your aclu and liberal side very well. 
|
|
Exsecratus_Sicarius
|
Mar 14 @ 8:44PM
|
|
For those of who are in support of Rev. Wright's ideology, and therefore, create excuses to justify his sermon, or feel it necessary to defend Hussein Obama:
If this post were about a white presidential candidate who had attended a white-supremacist church for 20+ years which has ties to the KKK, would you be in agreement of their hateful sermons and echo the sentiments of the racist white preacher? Would you be in support of this white racist presidential candidate?
If you would be in opposition to this hypothetical situation, and this white presidential candidate says such things as, "I don't agree with what the church says, so you can't hold me accountable." Would you accept that rebuttal?
No. You wouldn't accept such a rebuttal.
You know what you'd see in that situation?
You'd see the the media, Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson call this white presidential hopeful a "racist" and you'd see every Black American go on a rampage (especially if he would be elected).
.
.
.
Don't lie to yourselves people.
The hate represented in the A/V links of Wright's sermons, and the acceptance of such by Hussein Obama (for 20+years, mind you) is the same hate that you'd hear from Islamic Totalitarian States overseas that hate the United States of America.
.
.
.
|
|
observed50
|
Mar 14 @ 9:30PM
|
|
Mord> Here's your well-armed wit - "...this pro-infanticide, pro-palestinian, anti-semitic, racist & Muslim politician that passionately hates America and all she stands for....Liberals are the most extreme type of whores of all time. '
And you think liberals name call??? I'm not gonna argue whether they do or don't, but isn't this type of blog built first and foremost on name-calling, like that immediately above, and all other type of logical fallacies in presenting valid arguments for something? Claims to false authority, claims of universality, claims of generalizability from particularity...etc? Whenever you can feel such raw emotive arguments as the name-calling by such 'armed' wit, you can know almost immediately the argument being presented isn't valid or veridical because it grovels first in appeal to lowest common denominator emotions...fear, hate, anger, suspicion.
If an argument is valid, let the facts speak for themselves. But then, ideology would have no role. Name calling isn't a fact...its a primitive urge to hit.
Take your questions - loaded, with preconceived conclusions driven by the question..."do I want world government? Are you willing to sell out America?" The very nature of the questions evidences ideologically thick-glasses poised to see threat and traitor in any motion to find a path different than one's own place of perceiving. How does 'future together' get to 'sell out America?' Certainly not logically...but easily...ideologically.
What I suggested is that we need to get to the future together. There is no clearance sale there, no fire sale, no sale of any kind in that comment. It is simply an acknowledgement that if we think we can get to the future alone, then we should be honest to ourselves and the world about how many kids lives we think we have right to take so we feel less afraid in our mother's skirts. We need to be honest and let kids of rural areas and inner cities know they have to defend Hummer-society more so than kids whose families drive Hummers. To 'do something together' requires dialogue, listening, and very hard work which exceeds for most people the level of work it takes to sacrifice to their fear, their child or their neighbor's child.
It's easier to have parades, wear ribbons, 21 gun salutes, erect monuments and have stupid bumper stickers proclaiming how much we support our troops while we continue to insure a world where we wait in line to bury them, than it is to step back from the way we live our lives and ask the hard questions as to how can we do this better, more humane, more enlightened, less violent and rapacious. Easier to drop bombs for oil while driving Hummers, something unthinkable in our parent's younger years when sacrifice was shared, than it is to raise fundamental questions about how we live and its impact on those around us, the world around us.
Now, consumerism demands you don't know the true impact of our lives on the world around us, so when required, government can say meaningless things like "those people hate us' and never ever have to tell most Americans anything more substantive in order for them to fall in line, and believe. Understand why people hate? What's there to understand? Shoot...they hate us! Kill em!
Willing to sell us out? I've spent a lifetime defending my country from the dangers from within poised by groups like the NeoCons, the Reaganites, the Nixonistas, and all the Democratic Party's lack of spine in front of them. I've lived with death threats from the mindsets that flourished in the cultures of simple ideological 'traitorism' thinking common to the groups listed above, right wingers who just hated someone who didn't support the 'right' of this nation to blow people up willy nilly. Have you lived with death threats from Democrats??
For me, the Right wing seeks to unwittingly sell the country out everyday to 'statism' in the guise of 'security.' And while the ideological wing is out flapping and bobbing like in these blogs, Exxon, BP, Shell, et al are dividing up Iraq, and imposing their corporate logos on a peace agreement. Haliburton and KB are out siphoning hundreds of millions of dollars in sweetheart deals. It goes on and on, corporate execs giggling, while they let Ann and Rush and Bill and Michael and group, keep the masses watching for traitors comin over the next hill. "Keep yer eyes out guys...those liberal whores have been sighted moving this way!" (KA-CHING$$$$$$!!!)
If you unload your questions...then it gets much simpler..."how do get to the future together?" And if asked as a real question, you'd recognize you nor me nor anyone else, knows. And when no one knows, there is silence. And in silence, there is room for dialogue, no matter who is wearing what glasses. And yes...even those awful people we're so afraid of...ultimately, they want a conversation to know their lives are safe too. Yes..no more all of them than all of us. But that's why NeoCons and Taliban are cut from the same bloodied cloth. They each believe only they are right, and everyone who disagrees and is in the way...they must die. We just have bigger guns thereby removing the immediate need for suicide bombers. We use jet bombers instead. But dead people are dead people. Just ask the survivors and the infantry.
|
|
Exsecratus_Sicarius
|
Mar 15 @ 8:37AM
|
|
|
And you think liberals name call???
Observed,
It just came to me with-with-with-within the past few weeks ya’ll why so many folk are hatin’ o’ Barak Obama.
"He doesn’t fit the model.
He ain’t white.
He ain’t rich.
And he ain’t privileged.
……..I’m sick of Negros that just do not get it.
Hillary was not a black boy raised in a single parent home, Barak was. Barak knows what it means to be a black man living in a country, in a culture that is controlled by rich white people.
Hillary can never know that.
Hillary ain’t never been called a Nigger."
----Rev. Dr. Jeremiah Wright, pulpit, Trinity United Church of Christ, Chicago.
Mord> Here's your well-armed wit - "...this pro-infanticide, pro-palestinian, anti-semitic, racist & Muslim politician that passionately hates America and all she stands for....Liberals are the most extreme type of whores of all time.
RE: Hussein Obama,
pro-infanticide:http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/17/AR2007011701343.html ; http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51121
As a nurse at an Illinois hospital in 1999, I discovered babies were being aborted alive and shelved to die in soiled utility rooms. I discovered infanticide.
Legislation was presented on the federal level and in various states called the Born Alive Infants Protection Act. It stated all live-born babies were guaranteed the same constitutional right to equal protection, whether or not they were wanted.
BAIPA sailed through the U.S. Senate by unanimous vote. Even Sens. Clinton, Kennedy and Kerry agreed a mother's right to "choose" stopped at her baby's delivery.
The bill also passed overwhelmingly in the House. NARAL went neutral on it. Abortion enthusiasts publicly agreed that fighting BAIPA would appear extreme. President Bush signed BAIPA into law in 2002.
But in Illinois, the state version of BAIPA repeatedly failed, thanks in large part to then-state Sen. Barack Obama. It only passed in 2005, after Obama left.
I testified in 2001 and 2002 before a committee of which Obama was a member.
Obama articulately worried that legislation protecting live aborted babies might infringe on women's rights or abortionists' rights. Obama's clinical discourse, his lack of mercy, shocked me. I was naive back then. Obama voted against the measure, twice. It ultimately failed.
In 2003, as chairman of the next Senate committee to which BAIPA was sent, Obama stopped it from even getting a hearing, shelving it to die much like babies were still being shelved to die in Illinois hospitals and abortion clinics.
(As chair of that same committee, Obama once abruptly ended a hearing early, right before Scott and Janet Willis, the parents of six children killed as a result of Illinois' drivers licenses for bribes scandal, were to testify in favor of Choose Life license plate legislation. I was there for that one, too. The Willises had traveled three hours. Reporters filled the room. Obama stalled. He later killed the bill when no one was around.)
So, the reason Keyes said Jesus Christ wouldn't vote for Barack Obama was because of Obama's fanatical support of abortion to the point of condoning infanticide.
I have framed on my wall a Chicago Sun-Times cartoon published during the campaign. Obama is holding a sign with "LIVE BIRTH ABORTION" on it. God is reaching down from heaven to a baby in front of Obama, and the baby is reaching up to God. Obama is yelling at God, "You keep out of this!"
In his USA Today opinion piece, Obama admitted being "nagged" by the Jesus-wouldn't-vote-for-him statement, but only because he wished he'd given a different comeback.
Obama insinuated opposition to abortion is based only on religion, lecturing pro-lifers like me to "explain why abortion violates some principle that is accessible to people of all faiths, including those with no faith at all."
I don't recall mentioning religion when I testified against live-birth abortion. I only recall describing a live aborted baby I held in a hospital soiled utility room until he died, and a live aborted baby who was accidentally thrown into the trash.
Neither do I recall religion being brought into the partial-birth abortion ban debate. I recall comparisons made to U.S. laws ensuring animals being killed are treated humanely. I recall testimony that late-term babies feel excruciating pain while being aborted.
Obama stated pro-life proposals must be "amenable to reason."
pro-palestine, anti-semitic, black racist: listen to all the clips; audio from his pastor of 20 years
Muslim: read about the Muslim Birth Rites & read the Qur'an. Hussein Obama IS a Muslim.
.
.
.
Observed (yet willfully in denial), continue to ignore the facts if you wish. That is precisely what the liberals would expect from you, Mr. "non-conformist".
.
.
.
|
|
mordru
|
Mar 17 @ 12:11PM
|
|
|
Observed, PB is a big boy he can defend himself.Why do you feel you have to?I have no problem if you liberals want to call my politics anything you want.I do have a problem when its made personal.Remarks such as dragon boy,baby blimp,backwoods piece of chit are a few names your supposedly well educated inteligent liberal friends have called me.So BACK OFF!
|
|
observed50
|
Mar 17 @ 6:01PM
|
|
Mord> Your sensitivity to name-calling from others may be well-placed relative to others. But you wrote a response to me "Now let the liberal name calling begin." I was simply framing my answer relative to yours.
ES> To quote you..."continue to ignore the facts if you wish" Some simple facts you offered, and ignored.
You tell us Wright has been Obama's pastor of 20 years. He was pastor at Trinity United Church of Christ. UCC is a mainline, progressive protestant denomination about as close to the progressive understanding of the Gospel as one can get without being Quaker.
Now...then you assert he is Muslim. Progressives in Islam don't have any organizational identity. They're just progressive.
Now...is he Muslim or Protestant? If he's Muslim, you can't really suggest he pays much attention to his pastor (there are no pastors in Islam, only imams, occasionally) since his pastor is Protestant, and following in the historical path of Social Gospel theology, where Old Testament anger is as important as New Testament hope. So...is he Muslim, or UCC? They don't hybridize well. Okay...attempts at hybridization results in stillborns.
You accuse of him of pro-infanticide by listing articles. Did you read them both, or only the one you wanted to quote? The unquoted article shares the following...
"Abortion opponents see Obama's vote on medical care for aborted fetuses as a refusal to protect the helpless. Some have even accused him of supporting infanticide.
Obama _ who joined several other Democrats in voting "present" in 2001 and "no" the next year _ argued the legislation was worded in a way that unconstitutionally threatened a woman's right to abortion by defining the fetus as a child.
It would essentially bar abortions because the equal protection clause does not allow somebody to kill a child, and if this was a child then this would be an anti-abortion statute," Obama said in the Senate's debate in March 2001.
During his 2004 run for U.S. Senate, Obama said he supported similar federal legislation that included language clarifying that the measure did not interfere with abortion rights."
So pro-infanticide is an ideological attempt at a strawman argument - 'the fallacy of refuting a caricatured or extreme version of somebody's argument, rather than the actual argument they've made.' Actual argument would be the 'fact' as he is quoted in article #1...characterizing the argument and person as pro-infanticide is the non-fact.
I'm guessing you can deduce the strawmen you threw up with the rest of the name-calling. I notice you didn't attempt to go further with liberal extreme whores. Not sure how one would even attempt to argue 'fact' around something like that? Interviews of Extreme Whores? ESPN have a show on Extreme Whores?? American Idol have a season of Extreme Whores?
Conformity, by its nature, points to people following. Herd behavior, by its nature, is not about truth and not about fact...its about joining, belonging, and feeling secure because one has a place. The likelihood of finding truth in a herd of similar others, is minimal. Herds can't afford truth, because herds require fences and fences require lies about the people on the other side of the fence so herd members stay in the herd...lies like those found in 'liberal extreme whores' and those found in the names Mord mentions earlier pulled on him.
So it isn't liberals who expect my non-conformity. It's my mom and dad. But since you don't know them, I wouldn't expect you to know that is one of their deepest admirations of their son. He was a Goldwater Republican and today...a Buddhist and non-conformist.
|
|
|