When does life begin, at conception like everything else begins. When does a building begin? when it's built? Do we call a bridge something different before it reaches the other side? Everything known has stages of existence but it is what it is at conception. That conception can be mentally ( thought ) or physically. When sperm fertilizes the egg, it is what it is.
To make abortion reality meant that a plethora of other laws needed to be changed to legalize it and withstand legal challenges. Which should give some of you some insight just how illegal it is or was. The pressure didn't stop there either. How to alter and manipulate medical terminology to support the idea of abortion.
Before the 1960's it was the general consensus of the medical community that life starts at conception. It's not until the 60's and 70's and the birth of American radical liberalism for lack of better words that the medical definition was twisted and manipulated.
Abortion is nothing new, been around for quite along time. The main intention of Roe V. Wade was to protect women from alley abortions in which women often died during or soon after the procedure. It was not intended to be a blanket freedom nor form of birth control as it is today.
There is a difference between a mistake and irresponsibility. Our pro - abortionist and liberal gang bangers like to define them as one in the same. Forgetting your wallet at home while shopping is a mistake. Having unprotected sex is irresponsible.
As you can see by news reports and various other informational sources America is becoming more irresponsible by the minute. The only logical and rational conclusion is that it's all going to come tumbling down here shortly and frankly the tumbling has already started as I'm sure most of you are well aware of.
9th. grade biology at my school we were shown pictures and films of abortions. Try that in a public school. The only thought that could cross your mind is what kind of animal could do this. Frankly there is more sympathy and compassion on a freaken battlefield.
We can change law to fit, we can decide to call a red pen a blue pen but it's still a red pen. Who do you think your fooling? These are the same people that shout at the top of lungs about war, death, Iraq, etc. while they justify the killing fields in their own backyards to a tune of over a million a year.
In closing,
Does a woman have a right to " her own body " absolutely but were not just talking about " her own body " anymore are we. Were not just talking about human life here folks were talking about the conduct of a civilized society also.
The liberals fight tooth and nail for the rights of gay's and every other degenerate but when it comes to the right's of life itself, well let's just say the tolerance is overwhelming. 46 million dead and counting.
Copy & paste to friend: (Click inside box; Ctrl + C to copy; Ctrl + V to paste)
|
|
read more blogs!
|
street
|
May 29 @ 2:20AM
|
|
|
I was trying to get to secound base last nite ,,But I got aborted ....bummer !!
|
|
SunBabe
|
May 29 @ 2:41AM
|
|
Frankly, it's none of your or anybody else's damn business what I do or don't have in MY uterus. 
|
|
deeliciousme1
|
May 29 @ 3:01AM
|
|
|
I agree that abortion shouldn't be used as a form of birth control...this is a sensitive issue/subject and truely affects females...I mean for instance you can get with the same sex and actually experience homosexuality, color/disguise your race to experience racism...but to put on a 30-40 stomach piece is hardly what being pregnant is about...In my opinion once you have a uterus, experience real labor, give up your life for the good of a child...then maybe one can make decisions in this area...I have 2 daughters that I'm raising and I want them to have a choice, period...it takes 2 to be irresponsibile. If consequences affected both men and women from the time of conception...things might be a lil different...I'm conservative/republican.
|
|
Kandykammy
|
May 29 @ 7:22AM
|
|
I have no right to tell another woman what she must or must not do with her body. I think it is the woman's right to make that decision herself. Would the child be better off to be born and unwanted?
I believe that when the child breaths it's first breath of life, then it is considered a person.
I would never have an abortion myself, unless I was raped, but I will not tell another woman not to have one.
To force a woman to have a child that she does not want is wrong as I se it. People who want to force a woman to have a child shoud have to take care of that chiild for the woman.
Just my two cents worth.
|
|
LongRanger278
|
May 29 @ 7:52AM
|
|
|
Frankly, it's none of your or anybody else's damn business what I do or don't have in MY uterus.
When your pregnant it's not just " your " uterus anymore. You pro-abortionist seems to always ignore that fact. If I was to use the same logic, it's none of your damn business If I shoot and kill someone stealing my car but with hypocrites like yourself on the jury, I'd get 25 years.
|
|
fenderchick
|
May 29 @ 8:13AM
|
|
Abortion shouldn't be used as birth control, I know a girl in my area who has had 4 and she is not the only one.
I was blessed enough to get pregnant once and when her father said have an abortion I said oh, you want someone to kill you, because I'm not killing my baby!
It makes me physically sick that people have the option of using condoms and other method's of birth control(and yes I know they are not a100%), but choose to use nothing and then have abortion's when they turn up pregnant.
If you don't want children get your tubes tied, get your partner to have a vasectomy, use protection and be safe.
The only way to stop people from having abortions is to stop them from having sex, and that is never gonna happen...
You can choose what you want to do with your body, you can't just kill little parts of you off though because you weren't responsible enough to use precautions.
If no one agrees with me I don't really give a fig. Abortion is necessary in some cases, but if you were too lazy to get your partner to use a condom...It's your problem and his.
|
|
mike105
|
May 29 @ 8:24AM
|
|
|
Funny... these people scream about how bad abortion is.... but I dont see them building orphanages....trying to give a pregnant woman a choice..... funny
|
|
ragtopcookie
|
May 29 @ 8:50AM
|
|
|
Ive always been in the middle with this issue......i think the choice should always be there.....but im also glad that i will never have to make that choice ....i can see both points of view here.....but again......im real glad i dont have to make that choice...because who am i to decide for others?........cookie
|
|
johnnysacs
|
May 29 @ 8:54AM
|
|
|
If I shoot and kill someone stealing my car but with hypocrites like yourself on the jury
did you just compare the taking of a human life with the loss of a huge peice of metal?
in your obviously twisted way of thinking the two are the same? a car is as valuable as a life to you and you would be willing to take that life to protect your peice of metal?
wow,,that's all i can say,,,,,,and then your rallying the cause of human life in the same breath?
you really are confused sir,,,if your willing to take the life of some mother's child simply to protect some hunk of steel then what right do you have to tell anyone else about the importance of human life?
The significant problems we have cannot be solved at the same level of thinking with which we created them. - Albert Einstein
|
|
hereshannon
|
May 29 @ 8:54AM
|
|
|
Good blog, you made some outstanding points. It amazes me that in a "civilized" society that bills itself as a champion of human rights, we still allow this barbaric practice to take place. Abortion has become a matter of convienence for some people and that is criminal. Back in the 60's there was a stigma attached to becoming pregnant outside of marriage, it was socially unacceptable and that is what drove people to the back alley abortions. This stigma no longer exists in our society, and with all the available forms of birth control there is simply no excuse. Those in favor of abortion are always crying about their "right to choose", well you do have and always will have the right to choose. You have the right to choose whether or not to have unprotected sex! And yes, I can hear them all screaming WHAT ABOUT RAPE, WHAT ABOUT RAPE??? Well, rape is indeed a different matter, and in these cases the victim should be given the choice of taking the "morning after pill" at the hospital. And of course an abortion should be permitted if a womans life is in danger from the pregnancy. Abortion is just plain wrong, and EVERYONE KNOWS IT!!
|
|
EternalFlame
|
May 29 @ 9:41AM
|
|
When your little sister is raped and impregnated, or your daughter becomes pregnant at the age of 10 with the child of good old "Uncle Charlie", (but he's been a friend of the family for YEARS!) feel free to come back and change your mind.
Disgusting things happen, and if you would force a molested child to have a child, then you're more sick than I ever imagined.
|
|
briteyes35
|
May 29 @ 9:47AM
|
|
|
bad topic but then again u look for a good fight with all
|
|
observed50
|
May 29 @ 12:47PM
|
|
Interesting logic...
So...if I was to sell you a basement foundation...and call it a house....would that be correct in your logic??? Should I put up a sign and say..."House for Sale?"
Or maybe...I'll give you a map and show you where the bridge...only 1/3 complete...is located..."Take a turn at the fork in the road...and take the bridge across the Turkey River.." Now...since a bridge is a bridge is a bridge...in this logic you're pushing...you would be well served by these directions??
Yes...these are beginnings of things...but the beginnings of a bridge...the hole dug in the ground...the plan made on a desk...are not a bridge. Same with a house...same with a life. Yes...a life takes breath, moves, etc...but a life in making...the plan, the act, the insemination, etc...are not 'life'. They are life in the making. We have decided as a nation in evolving...that we will recognize the life as life when it can breathe on its own, when it is capable of being the 'whole' without tons of special exigencies. Like the house...we call it a house when the walls are up, the windows are in...etc. Do you really want to cross a bridge with no decking???
Your logic is known as the fallacy of composition in which you give to a piece of a thing, the properties of the whole.
And no...the medical community did not have a general consensus on life starting at conception. Where did you pull that from??? Since the Greeks and Plato...the beginning of 'life' has been debated because humans wanted to be special...so religions have tried to make us special by saying life came with the imparting of a soul. For some...that was at inception while with others it was all sorts of time periods post birth. It wasn't American radical liberalism in your effort to dismiss the constant changes around this definition, that gave rise to the changes. They had been in flux since the US began as states and nation tried to figure out when life began...beyond a church body saying something about spirit and soul. Things have swung back and forth between concern first for the mother, and concern for the fetus, as we have struggled to grant ever greater coverage of the protection of laws to those unprotected...and in Roe vs Wade...the decision was made...that women had rights to their body before the state had rights to their possible future citizen.
Though abortion wasn't intended as defacto birth control, it has always been the case that the argument against it was led by organizations wanting more members. The Catholic Church recognized long ago, as did the Amish, the Mormons and others...that unfettered breeding gave rise to big numbers. Orthodox religions always fight any form of birth control because they know that the best way to increase their flocks is through breeding and the brainwashing that comes with close-knit tightly controlled subgroups. Listen to the groups in which following is so important, and leadership is concentrated, and hierarchical...and they will be pushing breeding. More members! BREED!
The history of anti-abortion isn't about people's undying love for children - shoot..the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals had to lead the US to stop abusing children without repercussions. We protected pets before we protected children...and then we protected women. Anti-abortion has always been led and organized by groups wanting more members. The modern aberration of people seemingly so livid about the morality fails to look at the roots of the modern movement...which is conservative religious groups wanting more members...and leadership noting the best way to do that...is mobilize their moral flocks to create the heat. They don't tell members we should fight abortion because we want more members, more power. They lead by asserting the immorality of the act, thereby trying to keep their members from wandering off and accessing the tools of conviviality that are available to the dominant culture. The best way to protect though, is to insure there are no such tools available.
And those same groups don't want sex ed...breed em til they drop.
|
|
ladybuy2008
|
May 29 @ 12:59PM
|
|
hard to comment on a blog that is about personal and private matters and beliefs without offending someone. So I'll pass... 
|
|
MintSummer
|
May 29 @ 4:33PM
|
|
|
wow ... posted a blog on this subject last year or so ... got a LOT of angry responses, but I still stand by what I believe. I personally would never have an abortion, but I don't think ANYONE has the right to tell someone else what to do w/ their body. If a woman should NOT have an abortion, then maybe all the men whoring around out there (and yes, ur both whores if ur doing it w/ just anybody) should be made to have vastectomies. Fair is fair, if people want the government to mandate what a woman can or can not do, then they would have to cover the MALE species as well. Think on that one.
|
|
LongRanger278
|
May 29 @ 6:27PM
|
|
|
When your little sister is raped and impregnated, or your daughter becomes pregnant at the age of 10 with the child of good old "Uncle Charlie", (but he's been a friend of the family for YEARS!) feel free to come back and change your mind.
There are exceptions, rape would be one of them. The act wasn't consensual.
|
|
LongRanger278
|
May 29 @ 6:30PM
|
|
|
hard to comment on a blog that is about personal and private matters and beliefs without offending someone. So I'll pass..
Personal and private between whom?
|
|
imlost2
|
May 29 @ 9:01PM
|
|
|
I don't understand how a state can say that a child can be aborted at certain stages and it's not a child. Then at the same time if a woman is killed while being pregnant the person is charged with two deaths if it's a homicide? Some states do not prosecute murderers of pregnant woman as two separate deaths, and some states do. Like in the Lacey Peterson case and her baby, he was charged with two murders. It didn't matter how far along she was, that is the law. Hmmmm confusing eh? I think it's God's decision to place a child in a woman's body, therefore, I'd be scared to abort his wishes. But that's just me. tc Lost
|
|
LongRanger278
|
May 30 @ 9:52PM
|
|
|
Funny... these people scream about how bad abortion is.... but I dont see them building orphanages
and apparently your blind....................
|
|
|