| Mar 10, 2007 @ 10:30 AM |
Background check
|
|
dooney123
Posts: 3,511
|
Have any of you who get involved in LDRs with someone from online ordered a background check on him/her to see if he/she is married?
|
|
  |
|
| Mar 10, 2007 @ 11:23 AM |
Background check |
|
Loreli
Posts: 25,408
|
this has been done, look the thread up... 
|
| |
|
| Mar 10, 2007 @ 11:35 AM |
Background check
|
|
kattsmeow
Posts: 22,628
|
No I didn't and haven't.
|
|
| |
|
| Mar 10, 2007 @ 11:39 AM |
Background check |
|
dooney123
Posts: 3,511
|
and of course we know you are one of the success stories, Katts! 
|
| |
|
| Mar 10, 2007 @ 11:43 AM |
Background check
|
|
kattsmeow
Posts: 22,628
|
|
|
| |
|
| Mar 10, 2007 @ 11:53 AM |
Background check |
|
Haban3ro
Posts: 1,197
|
It happened to me in a nearby relationship (30 miles). I didn't mind, since I had nothing to hide.
We eventually broke up due to her suspicions. (We worked for different insurance companies. Maybe she thought I only wanted to get my hands on her...
Rate Book!) 
|
| |
|
| Mar 10, 2007 @ 11:57 AM |
Background check
|
|
dooney123
Posts: 3,511
|
|
|
| |
|
| Mar 10, 2007 @ 12:03 PM |
Background check |
|
MarysPlace
Posts: 2,930
|
Have any of you who get involved in LDRs with someone from online ordered a background check on him/her to see if he/she is married?
Those are notoriously unreliable.
Try trenchcoat, wig, glasses, diapers. I hear that works real well.
|
| |
|
| Mar 10, 2007 @ 12:04 PM |
Background check
|
|
dooney123
Posts: 3,511
|
Mary- that's an excellent idea. I'll have to try that. I think I'll also need a camera with a telephoto lens.
|
|
| |
|
| Mar 10, 2007 @ 12:07 PM |
Background check |
|
MarysPlace
Posts: 2,930
|
I think I'll also need a camera with a telephoto lens.
That's so outdated. What you need is rope, knives, duct tape and lots of large trash bags.
|
| |
|
| Mar 10, 2007 @ 12:10 PM |
Background check
|
|
dooney123
Posts: 3,511
|
That's so outdated. What you need is rope, knives, duct tape and lots of large trash bags.
Naw...if I wanted to hurt him, I'd just cast one of my spells on him....or, if I wanted to capture him, I'd....well, just cast one of my spells on him (of a different kind).
|
|
| |
|
| Mar 10, 2007 @ 12:11 PM |
Background check |
|
MarysPlace
Posts: 2,930
|
Naw...if I wanted to hurt him, I'd just cast one of my spells on him....or, if I wanted to capture him, I'd....well, just cast one of my spells on him (of a different kind).
You sure already have the personality to go with that, so it's all good!
|
| |
|
| Mar 10, 2007 @ 12:12 PM |
Background check
|
|
dooney123
Posts: 3,511
|
Thank you.
|
|
| |
|
| Mar 10, 2007 @ 12:13 PM |
Background check |
|
ISSUESWOPTIONS
Posts: 8,070
|
You sure already have the personality to go with that, so it's all good!
|
| |
|
| Mar 10, 2007 @ 12:16 PM |
Background check
|
|
LipGlossQueen9
Posts: 10,955
|
no, i haven't but i have wondered if i should sometimes 
|
|
| |
|
| Mar 10, 2007 @ 12:17 PM |
Background check |
|
dooney123
Posts: 3,511
|
LGQ- you probably should. Either that, or follow Mary's advice.
|
| |
|
| Mar 10, 2007 @ 12:20 PM |
Background check
|
|
MarysPlace
Posts: 2,930
|
Here's your serious answer:
If you're too stupid to figure out if the guy is married or not, then no background check is gonna help you anyway.
Second, I view those checks as invasion of privacy, bordering with downright stalking.
|
|
| |
|
| Mar 10, 2007 @ 12:23 PM |
Background check |
|
dooney123
Posts: 3,511
|
Wow, one of only 2 serious answers to the question and it comes from Mary - who knew?
|
| |
|
| Mar 10, 2007 @ 12:28 PM |
Background check
|
|
LipGlossQueen9
Posts: 10,955
|
Mary, it may not always be a case of stupidity, there might just have been other lies told in the past
|
|
| |
|
| Mar 10, 2007 @ 12:37 PM |
Background check |
|
ISSUESWOPTIONS
Posts: 8,070
|
I wanna background chek LGQ....
nice back.....
now hit the ground.... 
|
| |
|
|
|
|