|
page:
<<
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
>>
of 2 pages
|
< previous page | next page >
|
| Dec 13, 2006 @ 12:15 AM |
Dum Qustion
|
|
The_love_Giant
Posts: 693
|
I have a Dum qustion can a women how is about 40+ still get pergo?
|
|
  |
|
| Dec 13, 2006 @ 12:32 AM |
Dum Qustion |
|
painter007
Posts: 15,990
|
yes some til almost 50
|
| |
|
| Dec 13, 2006 @ 12:40 AM |
Dum Qustion
|
|
ToucherinSparks
Posts: 6,701
|
can a women how is about 40+ still get pergo?
Yes, she can get Pergo at any Home Depot, Lowe's, or other flooring retailer.
|
|
| |
|
| Dec 13, 2006 @ 1:00 AM |
Dum Qustion |
|
dowens
Posts: 869
|
Yep!....she sure can!.....but, a little shot of penecillon can cure it real quick!
|
| |
|
| Dec 13, 2006 @ 5:30 AM |
Dum Qustion
|
|
hiriya
Posts: 1,378
|
|
|
| |
|
| Dec 13, 2006 @ 8:19 AM |
Dum Qustion |
|
encorrgbl
Posts: 1,390
|
Touch, and Dow? lol!
Yeah, I've heard of women in their 40's still being able to get pregnant.
|
| |
|
| Dec 13, 2006 @ 8:27 AM |
Dum Qustion
|
|
luvmycats
Posts: 9,744
|
My mom had me when she was 41, sister had one when she was 42. My aunt had my cousin when she was 53. So I would say yes, it can and does happen.
|
|
| |
|
| Dec 13, 2006 @ 8:44 AM |
Dum Qustion |
|
chinabull2000
Posts: 7,012
|
There was a woman in the newspapers recently who got pregnant in her 70's. 
|
| |
|
| Dec 13, 2006 @ 8:57 AM |
Dum Qustion
|
|
Loreli
Posts: 20,319
|
I heard that too, China!
A few years ago there was a woman on Montel, or one of those shows, that said she was 59, and had a child every decade of her life (except the first) She had one at 18, in her 20s, 30's, 40s, 50s, so she wanted to get pregnant to have one at 60.... 
|
|
| |
|
| Dec 13, 2006 @ 9:07 AM |
Dum Qustion |
|
chinabull2000
Posts: 7,012
|
scary stuff sometimes, I think that common sense alone should dictate that you shouldn't be trying to get pregnant so late in life.
|
| |
|
| Dec 13, 2006 @ 9:18 AM |
Dum Qustion
|
|
razzired
Posts: 2,922
|
I heard a news story about a woman who was in her 60s.
I find that selfish, really. I know none of us have any guarantees, but we at least have the realistic hope of living to see our children graduate from high school, college, get married, have babies, etc. At that age, you're sentencing your child to either having to take care of you or sit at your funeral at an early age.
Not to mention the health problems associated with older mothers and babies born to them.
I think there's a reason our lives move in cycles, and messing with those cycles, pushing some of those boundaries, is just wrong.
MJ - sticking in her two knuts
|
|
| |
|
| Dec 13, 2006 @ 10:08 AM |
Dum Qustion |
|
definitelydi
Posts: 12,602
|
LMMFAO@Touchin! 
After you install the Pergo flooring, you may want to use condoms and/or other forms of birth control before you get down to bizness on your new floors.
|
| |
|
| Dec 13, 2006 @ 11:10 AM |
Dum Qustion
|
|
ash_is_unforgetable
Posts: 837
|
I agree with Razzired , its selfish because your only thinking of yourself by having a baby that late in life!
My personal thoughts I couldn't even think about having a child after 40.....
*AsH
|
|
| |
|
| Dec 13, 2006 @ 11:24 AM |
Dum Qustion |
|
Massgirl241982
Posts: 13
|
personaly I dont think that having a baby at 40 is being selfish. Some women try their whole live to have a baby and sometimes it does not happen.If it happens at 60 or40 it is not being selfish its about knowing that you brought this wonderful child into the world.I had my first child at 18 and my second at 21. I wish I was older when I had my kids because then I would be more prepared and settled. I dont think it is right for people to label a person selfish for wanting a child....No matter what age they are
|
| |
|
| Dec 13, 2006 @ 11:41 AM |
Dum Qustion
|
|
razzired
Posts: 2,922
|
Having a baby at 40 is a hell of a lot different than having one at 60. At 40, you can realistically expect to be there, in good health, when your child is growing up and needs you. At 60, that's not the case.
We're talking about being a parent here, not buying a puppy.
Yes, I still think it's selfish.
MJ
|
|
| |
|
| Dec 13, 2006 @ 12:55 PM |
Dum Qustion |
|
Massgirl241982
Posts: 13
|
I know we are not talking about a puppy im not a idiot.. I just think that if a person is 60 and wants a child then that is their choice . Just because of thier age that does not mean they are selfish for wanting to bring a life into the world.. Age does not make a person a good parent. Its the love that a parent has for a child, thats what makes a good parent... Yes they may no be around when the child is 20 but that goes for everyone . no one knows if they are going to be around when their child turns 20 or gets married and has kids.. Some people may only live till they are 25 or 90 . You never know what life will bring you.
|
| |
|
| Dec 13, 2006 @ 1:30 PM |
Dum Qustion
|
|
razzired
Posts: 2,922
|
We'll agree to disagree.
You're absolutely correct that none of us have any guarantees about waking up tomorrow. I'd disagree that age has nothing to do with being a good parent. It might not have any bearing on whether or not you (generally speaking) love your child, but yes...a 15 year old mother is a lot different than a 25 year old mother.
By the way, it is selfish when we make a decision only thinking about what "we" want and not how it might affect someone else. That's the definition of selfish.
Obviously, you're okay with elderly parents of infants. Fine.
I'm not. Fine.
MJ
|
|
| |
|
| Dec 13, 2006 @ 3:39 PM |
Dum Qustion |
|
shellsmack1
Posts: 852
|
Yes...and oh man, that would be the end of it all for ME.  
|
| |
|
| Dec 13, 2006 @ 3:42 PM |
Dum Qustion
|
|
steveemac
Posts: 2,336
|
I think my rule of thumb would be this: if Mother Nature closed the egg farm already, one should not ship in eggs from elsewhere in an effort to reopen said egg farm...if you really want kids after "the change," try adoption...I don't always feel that older people aren't supposed to be parents later in life; that should be judged on a case-by-case basis: for example, General Douglas MacArthur (1880-1964) became a father at the age of 59. Granted, his wife was 20 years younger-but my point is that everyone mistook HIM for being 20 years younger! One of his aides put it very succinctly in a letter home during WWII: "Believe me, the Old Man can take it!"
Of course, there are people in their late thirties that are totally burned out on life, or nearly so...definitely not good parenting material.
|
|
| |
|
| Dec 13, 2006 @ 5:13 PM |
Dum Qustion |
|
countryboy69995
Posts: 653
|
Hey do you mean that those of us at 38 with no children have chance? There is hope I guess. 
|
| |
|
|
|
page:
<<
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
>>
of 2 pages
|
< previous page | next page >
|
|