| Jun 28 @ 3:39 AM |
There are five Supreme Court JUstices who are dumb f***s
|
|
LipGlossQueen9
Posts: 10,088
|
I don't care how expensive it is to execute people.
Child molesters are not human beings and have no right to breathe the air any of us breathe. They should be executed without second thought. And put that shit on Pay-Per-View, too. BTW, I know it's not a deterrent. I just want them all to be killed. Get rid of them. Off them. Whatever. they don't deserve to be alive.
If anything is worth my taxpayer money, it is that shit.
If you think I'm cruel, deal with it. The f***er who raped me when I was little is cruel, and he's living happily with a wife now. 
|
|
  |
|
| Jun 28 @ 8:16 AM |
There are five Supreme Court JUstices who are dumb f***s |
|
SweetNapaGuy
Posts: 4,554
|
Among liberal Western democracies, how many other countries aside from the United States have capital punishment on their books?
Among brutal dictatorships, how many have capital punishment on their books?
Which category should we fall in?
|
| |
|
| Jun 28 @ 8:56 AM |
There are five Supreme Court JUstices who are dumb f***s
|
|
Paralegal_at_Law
Posts: 5,068
|
The law should allow the witnesses to each execution, the victim and victim's family to each press buttons that together with the prison staff's lethal injection buttons, releases the lethal chemicals into the bloodstream of the condemned prisoner.
|
|
| |
|
| Jun 28 @ 10:30 AM |
There are five Supreme Court JUstices who are dumb f***s |
|
Gallows_Humor
Posts: 8,063
|
The law should allow the witnesses to each execution, the victim and victim's family to each press buttons that together with the prison staff's lethal injection buttons, releases the lethal chemicals into the bloodstream of the condemned prisoner.
if this is so...it turns a justifiable execution into nothing more than a revenge killing... the whole concept of a state sponsored execution for the good of society is then lost.. who loses?? society... 
|
| |
|
| Jun 28 @ 10:40 AM |
There are five Supreme Court JUstices who are dumb f***s
|
|
bamagary
Posts: 814
|
law. i would say you think your a man of god right. well i think murder is a sin. and you can call killing a inmate. the laws of the state, but remember the bible. do not judge people. are you like most. use the bible when it pleases you. i think the latter.
|
|
| |
|
| Jun 28 @ 10:43 AM |
There are five Supreme Court JUstices who are dumb f***s |
|
Gallows_Humor
Posts: 8,063
|
^^^^^ needs to re read the bible... there is nothing in the 10 commandments that say executions are a sin against god...
|
| |
|
| Jun 28 @ 10:44 AM |
There are five Supreme Court JUstices who are dumb f***s
|
|
bamagary
Posts: 814
|
well heres where your wrong. dont it say throu shall not kill. yes or no answer will be fine.
|
|
| |
|
| Jun 28 @ 11:25 AM |
There are five Supreme Court JUstices who are dumb f***s |
|
crouchingtiger
Posts: 335
|
Napa, based on your posting:
Among liberal Western democracies, how many other countries aside from the United States have capital punishment on their books?
Among brutal dictatorships, how many have capital punishment on their books?
Which category should we fall in?
Do you have a problem of putting these f***ing pervs into the general prison population at say: "Shower Time?"
|
| |
|
| Jun 28 @ 11:35 AM |
There are five Supreme Court JUstices who are dumb f***s
|
|
SweetNapaGuy
Posts: 4,554
|
The true measure of a society can be seen in many situations. One of them is in how it treats its prisoners. We do not have to stop to the level of the criminal. Placing them in a situation where they are bound to be killed is even less honorable, less civilized, than the use of lethal injection. (At least lethal injection has the Rule of Law behind it. "Tapping them with the cane" is just outright sanctioned murder...)
If they're caught in the act, and the only way to stop them is to kill them, fine. But if we catch them, and convict them, lock them up for life. Isolate them for their own protection. Treat them with the dignity and respect we, as a society, deserve. We do it not for their benefit. We do it for our own. We are better than them, and we should show it.
|
|
| |
|
| Jun 28 @ 11:40 AM |
There are five Supreme Court JUstices who are dumb f***s |
|
bamagary
Posts: 814
|
we had a women here in south Carolina kill here kids, Susan smith. she got 20 years to life. but she will never get out of prison. she was young to. so after about 60 years of hell. she will regret her choices in life.
|
| |
|
| Jun 28 @ 11:47 AM |
There are five Supreme Court JUstices who are dumb f***s
|
|
crouchingtiger
Posts: 335
|
If they're caught in the act, and the only way to stop them is to kill them, fine. But if we catch them, and convict them, lock them up for life. Isolate them for their own protection. Treat them with the dignity and respect we, as a society, deserve. We do it not for their benefit. We do it for our own. We are better than them, and we should show it.
Napa, I can understand that, but a few years ago in Iowa a jack ass took a mentally handicapped girl, raped her, then took her across state lines before killing her and because of some legal thing, he was brought back to iowa to serve live in prison instead of being sent to the state where he killed the poor woman so he would not be put to death.
I say, you gas the sob's , shoot em with a shotgun from three inches from their head as no chance of missing and guarantee immediate death.
But these animals should not be allowed to breathe and if found guilty then give them two years to try to appeal the sentence, and if they can't get it done fry the sob's.
They didn't give their victims a chance for appeal, and their victims suffer more.
But, I don't want to pay for the toilet paper they will use for the rest of their days.
|
|
| |
|
| Jun 28 @ 11:58 AM |
There are five Supreme Court JUstices who are dumb f***s |
|
SweetNapaGuy
Posts: 4,554
|
And I'm sure that North Korea, China, and Iran all agree with your stance. But it seems the only Western democracy that is still actively practicing capital punishment is the United States.
|
| |
|
| Jun 28 @ 12:07 PM |
There are five Supreme Court JUstices who are dumb f***s
|
|
Kenn159
Posts: 2,774
|
I'm not really sure what is the best thing to do with child molesters, but it should be the maximum the law requires.
A crime doesn’t get any worse than molesting a child, and every effort needs to be made to make sure they don’t have the opportunity to do it again in this life time.
|
|
| |
|
| Jun 28 @ 12:46 PM |
There are five Supreme Court JUstices who are dumb f***s |
|
Gallows_Humor
Posts: 8,063
|
well heres where your wrong. dont it say throu shall not kill. yes or no answer will be fine.
no it does not...actually it says...thou shall not commit murder... there is a big difference between a lawful execution and murder...
http://www.biblestudy.org/question/what-does-thou-shall-not-kill-mean.htmlPlease explain the Sixth commandment which states 'Thou shall not kill.' Print Page Smaller Text | Larger Text Q. I am studying the Ten Commandments. Please explain the Sixth commandment "thou shall not kill." A. The commandment "thou shall not kill" (Exodus 20:13; Deuteronomy 5:17), is better understood to mean "you shall not murder." Most modern translations of the Bible rendered it this way. According to the Bible not all killing, the taking of a life, is murder. Murder is the unlawfully taking of human life. The command not to murder applies to human beings, not to killing animals or plant life for food. God gave animals to mankind for his use (Genesis 1:26-30; 9:1-4). But, this does not mean that humans have the right mistreat animals and the environment (Genesis 2:15; Deuteronomy 22:6-7; 25:4; Proverbs 12:10). Under the Old Covenant God allowed the Israelites to kill other humans under very special circumstances such as punishment for certain sins, for example, murder (Exodus 21:12-14, Leviticus 24:17, 21) and adultery (Leviticus 20:10, Deuteronomy 22:22-24). God also allowed the Israelites to engage in warfare and even gave them instructions about waging war (Deuteronomy 20:1-20). God also recognized that humans might accidentally kill each other, and he made provisions for this (Numbers 35:9-34; Deuteronomy 19:1-13). The primary reason God hates murder is that out of all creation, only human are made in the image of God (Genesis 1:26-27; 9:4-6). Even before the codification of the Ten Commandments at Mount Sinai the murder of other human beings was wrong (Genesis 4:8-12; 4:23-24; 9:4-6; Exodus 1:16-17). While on earth, Jesus spoke out against murder (Matthew 5:21-26; Mark 10:17-19). We also see in the writings of Paul (Romans 1:18, 29-32; 13:8-10; Galatians 5:19-21), James (James 2:8-11; 4:1-3), Peter (1 Peter 4:15-16) and John (Revelation 9:20-21; 21:7-8; 22:14-15) that murder is wrong. In Matthew 5:21-26 Jesus amplifies the meaning of the sixth commandment. He brings out that to commit murder means more then just killing someone, it means having an angry and unforgiving attitude towards them: "You have heard that it was said to those of old, ‘You shall not murder, and whoever murders will be in danger of the judgment.’ But I say to you that whoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment. And whoever says to his brother, ‘Raca!’ shall be in danger of the council. But whoever says, ‘You fool!’ shall be in danger of hell fire. "Therefore if you bring your gift to the altar, and there remember that your brother has something against you, leave your gift there before the altar, and go your way. First be reconciled to your brother, and then come and offer your gift. Agree with your adversary quickly, while you are on the way with him, lest your adversary deliver you to the judge, the judge hand you over to the officer, and you be thrown into prison. Assuredly, I say to you, you will by no means get out of there till you have paid the last penny." (Matthew 5:21-26, NKJV) The apostle John elaborates on this by writing that to hate someone is the same as murdering them: "Whoever hates his brother is a murderer, and you know that no murderer has eternal life abiding in him." (1John 3:15, NKJV). Murder like all sin, beginnings in the human mind (Matthew 15:18-19; Mark 7:20-23) it starts as a thought, in this case hatred, which leads to the action of murder (James 1:13-15; 4:1-3). The opposite of hating someone is loving them, we should even love our enemies (Matthew 5:43-48), seeking not revenge, but looking for ways to help them (Romans 12:17-21). As we have seen, under the Old Covenant God allowed humans to kill other humans under certain circumstances. But what about today, and those who are now under the New Covenant, should we participate in the execution of a murder or an adulterer? Should Christians involve themselves in warfare? I would argue that Christians should not participate in such activities because the New Covenant is a covenant of life, not of death (2 Corinthians 3:4-11). Under the New Covenant Christians do not execute people for sinning. The most drastic steps anyone can take against an unrepentant Christian are withholding brotherly fellowship from him until he repents (1 Corinthians 5:9-13; 2 Thessalonians 3:14-15); and delivering or handing him over to Satan for spiritual correction (1 Corinthians 5:1-5; 1 Timothy 1:18-20). It is unclear from the scriptures exactly what it means to turn someone over to Satan. Under the New Covenant a change occurred. ...........Answer Given By: Calvin Lashway
|
| |
|
| Jun 28 @ 1:20 PM |
There are five Supreme Court JUstices who are dumb f***s
|
|
jaybird777
Posts: 1,041
|
Sorry but if we have to lock the ass hole son a bitches up for life i don't want to pay to have them specially guarded. 
Their reasoning was that the punishment of execution did not fit the crime
The guards stand outside and then after an hour order them back to their cells.
100 cons return to their cells but the perv is dead after he was f***ed with hammer handles and screwdrivers for about 50 minutes.
Now THAT is a punishment what fits the crime.
RIGHT ON DUDE!!!!!
|
|
| |
|
| Jun 28 @ 1:45 PM |
There are five Supreme Court JUstices who are dumb f***s |
|
LipGlossQueen9
Posts: 10,088
|
I'm not really sure what is the best thing to do with child molesters, but it should be the maximum the law requires.
No. The current forms of execution are not brutal enough.
|
| |
|
| Jun 28 @ 2:03 PM |
There are five Supreme Court JUstices who are dumb f***s
|
|
Say_Yes
Posts: 1,786
|
By the same token, it has never been demonstrated that the risk of being sent to prison (even for a life term, with no chance of parole), is an effective deterrent to criminal behaviour either. As such, by your logic, we should not send them to jail either, as it really does not change societal behaviour.
Actually, sending them to jail DOES change SOCIETAL behavior, because while they are in jail they are removed from society, thus the character of open society is changed (presumably for the better) by the removal of that element. Life without parole means they have no further opportunity to commit the crimes for which they were sentenced. My stance on the death penalty has for 35 years or more been: If it is wrong to kill people, then it is wrong to kill people. They are incarcerated, they are no longer a danger to society, and executions are nothing more than vengance.
Again, by that logic, then when they are dead, they are also removed from society. So, being dead would have the same affect on changes in societal behaviour, with the exception being that execution is a permanent solution, at a lower cost to society. (Yes, I know it currently cost more to execute someone, than it does to keep them in prison for life, due to the endless appeals process. That is a problem with the process, not the actual cost to do the execution.)
In our judiciary there is supposed to be consideration as to what is reasonable punishment, in light of the offense that was committed. You do not give someone life in prison, for speeding, jay walking, shop lifting etc., as that level of punishment is not reasonalbe for the offense committed. If you steal $1,000, then an equitable punishment might be that you not only be forced to repay what was stolen, but all cost associated with the prosecution of the crime and a fine that is equitable to the impact of the crime.
By that logic then, if you murder someone, then the only equitable payment for your action, is that you forfiet your own life.
As for the morality of it, from my point of view, it is much different for a society to say, if you do any of the following things, then we as a society have the right and obligation to execute you, for doing them. Then, if a criminal chooses to do those things, which carry this penalty, they are the ones, who made the choice and who must face the consequences of their actions.
If you know that the penalty for first degree murder is death, you choose to commit murder, then you are the one who made the choice to forfiet your life, in payment for your crime.
Deterence is not the only measure, of what is the reaonable consequence to be imposed by society on criminal behaviour. Punishment is also a part of that equation, as to what is just. A great deal of the problems we face with crime in this nation, is the fact that career criminals know how the system works and they do not fear the consequences of their actions. If we change the punishment, such that consequence of making the choice to rob, murder, rape etc., is so severe that people will change their behaviour, then that punishment will be a deterent. As it is now, we do not have that in our society and crime is out of control.
|
|
| |
|
| Jun 28 @ 2:08 PM |
There are five Supreme Court JUstices who are dumb f***s |
|
kattsmeow
Posts: 21,272
|
we had a women here in south Carolina kill here kids, Susan smith. she got 20 years to life. but she will never get out of prison. she was young to. so after about 60 years of hell. she will regret her choices in life.
I imagine all of us remember this one.
She should have been put in a car and then into the water her self.
|
| |
|
| Jun 28 @ 3:50 PM |
There are five Supreme Court JUstices who are dumb f***s
|
|
Angel54214
Posts: 14,056
|
Remember Marly Winkler? The woman that killed her husband the minister and convicted of voluntary manslaughter upon her testamony. She only served 67 days!
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/08/14/national/main3167002.shtml
"Justice Is Blind"
|
|
| |
|
| Jun 28 @ 5:31 PM |
There are five Supreme Court JUstices who are dumb f***s |
|
jaybird777
Posts: 1,041
|
we had a women here in south Carolina kill here kids, Susan smith. she got 20 years to life. but she will never get out of prison. she was young to. so after about 60 years of hell. she will regret her choices in life. Them two little fellers were at the bottom a the lake, still holding each others hands. It wasn't no black stranger (like she claimed) It was thier MOTHER. THe person who was spossed ta be reading em bed time stories, and kissin their foreheads when theys sick.
Sorry, the "she will suffer in jail" donna cut it fer me.
Every breath a air she takes is a horrible injustice ta them two poor little boys
|
| |
|
|
|
|