| May 10, 2009 @ 11:57 AM |
Swine flu |
|
Peabianjay

Posts: 1,790
|
Capo: The the liberal Los Angeles Times was in error when they posted this story? You have a very convenient memory...and an unrealistic liberal slant to your "views". No obvious error in the Times, Capo.
There's a huge difference between, "I'd avoid walking in Detroit downtown at night." and "There should be a 10pm universal curfew." Who exactly turned his comments about avoiding unnecessary confinement into a scandal? Evidentally, the Times didn't. Did you actually read the story you linked? Heh.
(I also don't see how "liberal" has anything to do with it.)
DR: It was a HOAX. And exactly as I predicted, it's not yet two weeks later and you can't even find any mention of this flu in the news anymore. Curious....weren't you complaining that it was blown out of proportion....now you're complaining they're not? Make up your mind, already.
|
|
 |
|
| May 10, 2009 @ 12:21 PM |
Swine flu |
|
capobeachguy


Posts: 4,877
|
Of course I read the story, Pea.
My favorite was the penultimate paragraph in which White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs tries to clean up Joe Biden's mess:
"I understand what he said. I'm telling you what he meant to say," Gibbs said. You had said "I was amused by how Biden's words were twisted and exaggerated. " Apparently your amusement was not shared by Gibbs, 0bama, or the rest of the herd.
|
 |
|
| May 11, 2009 @ 1:55 AM |
Swine flu |
|
kjac

Posts: 8,163
|
The latest story of the non-existent flu that exists.
|
|
 |
|
| May 11, 2009 @ 7:55 AM |
Swine flu |
|
dafengluobote

Posts: 7
|
China Reports First Case of Swine Flu http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/12/world/asia/12flu.html?ref=global-home
|
 |
|
| May 11, 2009 @ 10:04 AM |
Swine flu |
|
eastham

Posts: 8,145
|
Very interesting story on the flu from BBC radio. While it now appears that the swine flu is a pandemic, because of the large number of cases, it is not as severe as first believed, because public health officials were reacting to the severity of the hospitalized cases as being representative of the flu as a whole.
When it comes to infectious disease, it is better to err on the side of caution and cautious minds are still worried that that this flu will have an impact during the next flu cycle in the fall.
|
|
 |
|
| Jun 12, 2009 @ 9:42 AM |
Swine flu |
|
Loreli

Posts: 25,816
|
Flu Experts Declare H1N1 a Pandemic By KCRG Intern
Story Created: Jun 11, 2009 at 11:14 AM CDT
Story Updated: Jun 11, 2009 at 11:14 AM CDT The world's leading flu experts gathered Thursday morning for a high stakes, emergency meeting declaring an H1N1 flu pandemic. Being the first in more than forty years.
The virus has swept through 74 countries and here at home, has hit all fifty states.
The World Health Organization says it decided to raise the pandemic alert level from phase 5 to 6, meaning that a global outbreak of H1N1 has begun.
States and Territories* Confirmed and Probable Cases Deaths States Alabama 94 cases 0 deaths Alaska 3cases 0 deaths Arkansas 9cases 0 deaths Arizona 547 cases 4 deaths California 973 cases 0 deaths Colorado 75 cases 0 deaths Connecticut 395 cases 1 death Delaware 142 cases 0 deaths Florida 247 cases 0 deaths Georgia 33 cases 0 deaths Hawaii 115 cases 0 deaths Idaho 16 cases 0 deaths Illinois 1357 cases 5 Indiana 173 cases 0 deaths Iowa 92 cases 0 deaths Kansas 92 0 deaths Kentucky 96 0 deaths Louisiana 134 cases 0 deaths Maine 17 0 deaths Maryland 89 0 deaths Massachusetts 787 0 deaths Michigan 298 cases 1 death Minnesota 82 0 deaths Mississippi 40 cases 0 deaths Missouri 46 cases 1 death Montana 15 cases 0 deaths Nebraska 60 cases 0 deaths Nevada 128 cases 0 deaths New Hampshire 64 cases 0 deaths New Jersey 148 cases 0 deaths New Mexico 108 cases 0 deaths New York 858 cases 8 deaths North Carolina 30 cases 0 deaths North Dakota 23 cases 0 deaths Ohio 35 cases 0 deaths Oklahoma 93 cases 0 deaths Oregon 167 cases 0 deaths Pennsylvania 299 cases 0 deaths Rhode Island 18 cases 0 deaths South Carolina 60 0 deaths South Dakota 10 cases 0 deaths Tennessee 104 cases 0 deaths Texas 1670 cases 3 deaths Utah 461 cases 2 deaths Vermont 9 cases 0 deaths Virginia 55 cases 1 death Washington 577 cases 1 death Washington, D.C. 24 cases 0 deaths West Virginia 6 cases 0 deaths Wisconsin 2217 cases 0 deaths Wyoming 25 cases 0 deaths Territories Puerto Rico 1 case 0 deaths TOTAL*(52) 1
|
 |
|
| Jun 12, 2009 @ 10:59 AM |
Swine flu |
|
eastham

Posts: 8,145
|
The WHO (World Health Organization) has officially called H1N1 a phase-6 pandemic. The flu is now in 74 countries, with 27,000 confirmed cases and 141 confirmed deaths. Raising the flu to a level 6 does not indicate severity, but simply the sheer number of people who have contracted this flu or who are at risk for doing so.
Statement by WHO director-general, Dr. Margaret Chan.
|
|
 |
|
| Jun 12, 2009 @ 2:12 PM |
Swine flu |
|
Nightowl001

Posts: 8,214
|
So much for the confident predictions by a few that this would be "out of the news within 2 weeks."
|
 |
|
| Jun 12, 2009 @ 2:19 PM |
Swine flu |
|
lacyvsq

Posts: 6,796
|
It's not news. It is propaganda.
|
|
 |
|
| Jun 12, 2009 @ 2:32 PM |
Swine flu |
|
eastham

Posts: 8,145
|
Well, we just had our 8th death in the City of New York. We also have 25 confirmed cases at Riker's, which given the close quarters there will mean more will certainly come down with the flu, even with quarantine measures.
|
 |
|
| Jun 12, 2009 @ 2:49 PM |
Swine flu |
|
capobeachguy


Posts: 4,877
|
How many folks died in New York last year of flu or flu-related causes? It was posted earlier that approximately 33,000 people perish country-wide each year...it would seem to me that NYC would get its share of those.
|
|
 |
|
| Jun 12, 2009 @ 3:17 PM |
Swine flu |
|
eastham

Posts: 8,145
|
The CDC groups NY, NJ, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands into Region II for flu data collection. 3,000 of the 36,000 flu deaths were in Region II and 8 of those were pediatric cases. Wouldn't want to live in Arkansas, Texas, Oklahoma or Louisiana as Region VI led the nation in flu deaths.
Here's hoping that all new cases turn out to be mild.
|
 |
|
| Jun 12, 2009 @ 3:42 PM |
Swine flu |
|
Angel54214

Posts: 19,005
|
Some of the U.S. recent reported deaths were due to other health issues that existed in them at the time they received the swine flu.
Confirmed Cased by State: http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2009-06-04-swine-flu_N.htm?csp=34
|
|
 |
|
| Jun 12, 2009 @ 3:46 PM |
Swine flu |
|
eastham

Posts: 8,145
|
As are the case with most of the regular flu deaths. The deaths disproportionately affect the elderly, the chronically ill and the young.
|
 |
|
| Jun 12, 2009 @ 3:53 PM |
Swine flu |
|
capobeachguy


Posts: 4,877
|
Is there any indication that the "swine flu" is any more virulent than other flu strains?
|
|
 |
|
| Jun 12, 2009 @ 3:54 PM |
Swine flu |
|
Angel54214

Posts: 19,005
|
In the U.S...I don't think so. there were 20,000 deaths in the U.S. last year of the regular flu we get.
As of June 5th, the U.S. has reported a total of 10 deaths of the swine flu.
|
 |
|
| Jun 12, 2009 @ 4:00 PM |
Swine flu |
|
eastham

Posts: 8,145
|
No, capo, but the severity of the flu is not what determines if it is a pandemic, it's the sheer number of people affected. The more you have fall ill, of course, the greater the chance someone who has a weakened constitution will fall ill and die.
That said, at the beginning of the pandemic, some feared that it was going to be more virulent; basing their concerns on the severity of those cases in Mexican hospitals.
|
|
 |
|
| Jun 12, 2009 @ 6:57 PM |
Swine flu |
|
capobeachguy


Posts: 4,877
|
I certainly understand what determines a pandemic; what I fail to understand is why this is still in the news when it doesn't seem to be much different from any other influenza.
400,000 people die in the United States from smoking-related causes. That, due to the sheer numbers, would seem to warrant far more coverage.
|
 |
|
| Jun 12, 2009 @ 7:51 PM |
Swine flu |
|
alivenwell351

Posts: 3,345
|
It's not news. It is propaganda.
poster child for if ya can't dazzle em with brilliance baffle em with bullshit.....
|
|
 |
|
| Jun 12, 2009 @ 11:54 PM |
Swine flu |
|
katydid438

Posts: 8,306
|
I certainly understand what determines a pandemic; what I fail to understand is why this is still in the news when it doesn't seem to be much different from any other influenza. ......well for one thing the annual flu season should be over by now. This is a new (novel) virus which has components of swine/avian/human virus. Most annual influenza in composed of only 2 strains, not 3...because of this, it is kind of like a rogue virus. And. if you notice, it is not affecting the usual population,,,the old and the very young....it is the 19 to 50ish age group that is being affected......this follows the same pattern as the Spanish Flu 1918.,,at the risk of droning on,,,,research will tell you that pandemic influenza viruses come in waves...this is the first wave.. the second wave could/will surface in a few months...by then the virus could become more virulent only to save itself and ultimately cause increased numbers of cases and deaths. Certainly we are not experiencing at the present time the doom and gloom of the dreaded "Avian Pandemic'....but we are tickling the dragons's tail.......we are getting a head's up BTW...I am an Infection Control Nusre
|
 |
|
|
|
|