AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Free Dating
search My Threads  

Main    Politics & Current Events   

to eat fish..or not to eat fish......that is the question..


Jul 30 @ 5:48 PM to eat fish..or not to eat fish......that is the question..    
Gallows_Humor


Posts: 13,662
or. ....to eat fish now..and not later..





Survey: Edible fish won't disappear if overfishing stops

A driver handles tunas weighing over 670 pounds at the Basque Port of Hondarribia in San Sebastian, Spain, June 29. It's no secret that overfishing has driven many tuna species including the iconic blue fin to the brink of extinction, but there is plenty of disagreement over what should be done about it.

By Elizabeth Weise, USA TODAY
Three years after a controversial paper predicted the collapse of 90% of the world's edible fish species by 2048, the original paper's author and a main opponent have collaborated on a groundbreaking survey of the Earth's oceans which finds hope for fish stocks and the millions who rely on them for protein

— but only if overfishing is ended.

The paper, published today in the journal Science, comes after a 2006 Science paper by marine biologist Boris Worm of Dalhousie University in Canada and colleagues. Its prediction of the destruction of fish populations because of overfishing and ecosystem destruction caused enormous controversy among marine ecologists and fisheries biologists.

But a 2006 radio interview that brought Worm and fisheries biologist Ray Hilborn of the University of Washington in Seattle together to debate the paper led them to launch an international research effort over two years involving 21 scientists who surveyed 166 areas where specific fish species are caught — called a fishery worldwide and looked intensively at 10 marine ecosystems.

"It was like a 'CSI' for overfishing," says Worm.

What they found was that in areas where the rate of fishing is reduced, even collapsed fish stocks can revive and become commercially viable again.

"This has enormous practical application for the United States and world policy, with billions of dollars at stake," says Steve Murawski, chief scientist of the National Marine Fisheries Service.

The key to healing overfished marine populations, the scientists found, is to cut the number of fish taken to somewhat below what's long been considered the maximum sustainable yield.

"Unfortunately there's a significant period of low catches required to rebuild stocks to higher levels," but long term, most fisheries can rebound, says Hilborn.

The most effective ways to allow fish populations to recover include closing some areas to fishing to give stocks secure breeding areas, changing fishing gear so smaller and juvenile fish can slip through and establishing catch share programs that assign fishermen the right to harvest a certain amount of fish so there isn't the unbridledcompetition

Of the 10 areas intensively studied, the best managed were in the U.S., Iceland and New Zealand.

But 63% of the assessed fish stocks worldwide still need rebuilding, the researchers found.

A major problem is that many industrialized countires have protected their own fish stocks, but then send their fishing fleets to countries with weaker laws and enforcement capacity. This is especially a problem in Africa.

"In the United States, 83% of what we eat in seafood comes from overseas, in many cases from these countries that have a poor track record," says Murawski.


If we stop eating so much tuna....will the cans ...be sent to another country..??. or used for cat food??
post reply view Gallows_Humor's threads
Jul 30 @ 7:42 PM to eat fish..or not to eat fish......that is the question..    
arieann


Posts: 2,086
If we stop eating so much tuna

You dont have to worry about me eating it. I ate it once. It was disgusting.
post reply view arieann's threads
Jul 30 @ 9:33 PM to eat fish..or not to eat fish......that is the question..    
uab_5


Posts: 4,759
Howabout tuna tacos?
post reply view uab_5's threads
Jul 31 @ 2:20 PM to eat fish..or not to eat fish......that is the question..    
redhairNfreckles


Posts: 4,698
I have noticed a different smell and taste with every can of tuna I open. Doesn't matter what the name brand is, something is very different with the quality now.
post reply view redhairNfreckles' threads
Jul 31 @ 5:05 PM to eat fish..or not to eat fish......that is the question..    
lacyvsq


Posts: 6,173
How about tuna tacos?

Not something I care to try, but I think you have the wrong forum...
post reply view lacyvsq's threads
Aug 7 @ 2:22 PM to eat fish..or not to eat fish......that is the question..    
Gallows_Humor


Posts: 13,662

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/outposts/2009/08/vote-on-marine-reserves-off-northcentral-coast-not-to-anglers-liking.html
....The California Fish and Game Commission on Wednesday afternoon adopted the Integrated Preferred Alternative within the Marine Life Protection Act process as it pertains to the North-Central coast.

It will create 24 marine protected areas and ban or restrict fishing in nearly 20% of coastal waters between Half Moon Bay and Point Arena.

The commission adopted the measure -- one of four alternative measures up for consideration -- by a vote of 3-2.

While environmental groups were pleased with a measure they believe will help ensure the long-term survival of beleaguered fish stocks, fishermen did not waste time bemoaning the loss of historic fishing grounds and what they perceive to be a threat to their livelihoods. State game wardens complained that they're already overworked and may not be able to guard against poaching and other violations.

"For me the most painful is an area called Fitzgerald's Reef, which extends outside the harbor six miles along the coast and three miles offshore," said Capt. William Smith of the recreational fishing boat Rip Tide, which runs from Half Moon Bay. "That's always been a major fishery for us."

Much of the waters surrounding the Farallon Islands west of San Francisco also will be closed to fishing, with a few seasonal exceptions. Nature viewing operations might also be affected there because there will be a 1,000-foot buffer zone from North Island. A spokesman for a small seaweed harvesting business at Point Arena said it will suffer a 40% annual loss because of the restrictions.

The closures are scheduled to go into effect Jan. 1


post reply view Gallows_Humor's threads
Aug 7 @ 2:31 PM to eat fish..or not to eat fish......that is the question..    
budo13


Posts: 3,609
Now we are starting to ban fishing .I wonder what will be next thank God this was in Cali.
post reply view budo13's threads
Aug 8 @ 10:57 AM to eat fish..or not to eat fish......that is the question..    
Gallows_Humor


Posts: 13,662
not ban fishing...

but to leave 20 percent of the area off limits...

which allows...80 percent to sitll be able to be fished out...

like ...for example..... this...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BA7enHKa5As
post reply view Gallows_Humor's threads
Main    Politics & Current Events    to eat fish..or not to eat fish......that is the question..

free adult dating | mission statement | testimonials | safety warning | report abuse | safe list | privacy | legal | advertise | link to us

© Copyright 2000-2009 Online Singles, LLC.
WEB1